Where the Devil Hides: Deepfake Detectors Can No Longer Be Trusted
Shuaiwei Yuan, Junyu Dong, Yuezun Li
Abstract
With the advancement of AI generative techniques, Deepfake faces have become incredibly realistic and nearly indistinguishable to the human eye. To counter this, Deepfake detectors have been developed as reliable tools for assessing face authenticity. These detectors are typically developed on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) and trained using third-party datasets. However, this protocol raises a new security risk that can seriously undermine the trustfulness of Deepfake detectors: Once the third-party data providers insert poisoned (corrupted) data maliciously, Deepfake detectors trained on these datasets will be injected "backdoors" that cause abnormal behavior when presented with samples containing specific triggers. This is a practical concern, as third-party providers may distribute or sell these triggers to malicious users, allowing them to manipulate detector performance and escape accountability. This paper investigates this risk in depth and describes a solution to stealthily infect Deepfake detectors. Specifically, we develop a trigger generator, that can synthesize passcode-controlled, semantic-suppression, adaptive, and invisible trigger patterns, ensuring both the stealthiness and effectiveness of these triggers. Then we discuss two poisoning scenarios, dirty-label poisoning and clean-label poisoning, to accomplish the injection of backdoors. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness, stealthiness, and practicality of our method compared to several baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e36742b9-4802-4beb-a289-4f14dc258f30Cited by top-tier papers2
- TriDF: Evaluating Perception, Detection, and Hallucination for Interpretable DeepFake DetectionJian-Yu Jiang-Lin, Kang-Yang Huang, Ling Zou, Ling Lo et al.CVPR 2026 · 5 citations
- AVFakeBench: A Comprehensive Audio-Video Forgery Detection Benchmark for AV-LMMsShuhan Xia, Peipei Li, Xuannan Liu, Dongsen Zhang et al.CVPR 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on20
- FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial ImagesAndreas Rössler, Davide Cozzolino, Luisa Verdoliva, Christian Riess et al.ICCV 2019 · 2,966 citations
- Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image RecognitionJoel Frank, Thorsten Eisenhofer, Lea Schönherr, Asja Fischer et al.ICML 2020 · 848 citations
- Invisible Backdoor Attack with Sample-Specific TriggersYuezun Li, Yiming Li, Baoyuan Wu, Longkang Li et al.ICCV 2021 · 639 citations
- Neural Attention Distillation: Erasing Backdoor Triggers from Deep Neural NetworksYige Li, Xixiang Lyu, Nodens Koren, Lingjuan Lyu et al.ICLR 2021 · 548 citations
- Anti-Backdoor Learning: Training Clean Models on Poisoned DataYige Li, Xixiang Lyu, Nodens Koren, Lingjuan Lyu et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 503 citations
Related papers
- Poisoned Forgery Face: Towards Backdoor Attacks on Face Forgery DetectionJiawei Liang, Siyuan Liang, Aishan Liu, Xiaojun Jia et al.ICLR 2024 · 40 citations
- Beating Backdoor Attack at Its Own GameMin Liu, Alberto L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, Xiangyu YueICCV 2023 · 19 citations
- COMBAT: Alternated Training for Effective Clean-Label Backdoor AttacksTran Huynh, Dang Nguyen, Tung Pham, Anh TranAAAI 2024 · 25 citations
- DEFEAT: Deep Hidden Feature Backdoor Attacks by Imperceptible Perturbation and Latent Representation ConstraintsZhendong Zhao, Xiaojun Chen, Yuexin Xuan, Ye Dong et al.CVPR 2022 · 72 citations
- Invisible Poison: A Blackbox Clean Label Backdoor Attack to Deep Neural NetworksRui Ning, Jiang Li, Chunsheng Xin, Hongyi WuINFOCOM 2021 · 56 citations
