SAS: Simulated Attention Score
Chuanyang Zheng, Jiankai Sun, Yihang Gao, Yuehao Wang, Peihao Wang, Jing Xiong, Liliang Ren, Hao Cheng, Janardhan Kulkarni, Yelong Shen, Zhangyang (Atlas) Wang, Mac Schwager
Abstract
The attention mechanism is a core component of the Transformer architecture. Various methods have been developed to compute attention scores, including multi-head attention (MHA), multi-query attention, group-query attention and so on. We further analyze the MHA and observe that its performance improves as the number of attention heads increases, provided the hidden size per head remains sufficiently large. Therefore, increasing both the head count and hidden size per head with minimal parameter overhead can lead to significant performance gains at a low cost. Motivated by this insight, we introduce Simulated Attention Score (SAS), which maintains a compact model size while simulating a larger number of attention heads and hidden feature dimension per head. This is achieved by projecting a low-dimensional head representation into a higher-dimensional space, effectively increasing attention capacity without increasing parameter count. Beyond the head representations, we further extend the simulation approach to feature dimension of the key and query embeddings, enhancing expressiveness by mimicking the behavior of a larger model while preserving the original model size. To control the parameter cost, we also propose Parameter-Efficient Attention Aggregation (PEAA). Comprehensive experiments on a variety of datasets and tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed SAS method, achieving significant improvements over different attention variants.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on44
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State SpacesAlbert Gu, Karan Goel, Christopher RéICLR 2022 · 3,482 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
Related papers
- Improving Transformers with Dynamically Composable Multi-Head AttentionDa Xiao, Qingye Meng, Shengping Li, Xingyuan YuanICML 2024 · 8 citations
- MoH: Multi-Head Attention as Mixture-of-Head AttentionPeng Jin, Bo Zhu, Li Yuan, Shuicheng YanICML 2025 · 2 citations
- Tucker Attention: A generalization of approximate attention mechanismsTimon Klein, Jonas Kusch, Sebastian Sager, Stefan Schnake et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- DHA: Learning Decoupled-Head Attention from Transformer Checkpoints via Adaptive Heads FusionYilong Chen, Linhao Zhang, Junyuan Shang, Zhenyu Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 12 citations
- Two Heads are Better than One: Simulating Large Transformers with Small OnesHantao Yu, Josh AlmanNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
