Tucker Attention: A generalization of approximate attention mechanisms
Timon Klein, Jonas Kusch, Sebastian Sager, Stefan Schnake, Steffen Schotthöfer
Abstract
The pursuit of reducing the memory footprint of the self-attention mechanism in multi-headed self attention (MHA) spawned a rich portfolio of methods, e.g., group-query attention (GQA) and multi-head latent attention (MLA). The methods leverage specialized low-rank factorizations across embedding dimensions or attention heads. From the point of view of classical low-rank approximation, these methods are unconventional and raise questions of which objects they really approximate and how to interpret the low-rank behavior of the resulting representations. To answer these questions, this work proposes a generalized view on the weight objects in the self-attention layer and a factorization strategy, which allows us to construct a parameter efficient scheme, called Tucker Attention. Tucker Attention requires an order of magnitude fewer parameters for comparable validation metrics, compared to GQA and MLA, as evaluated in LLM and ViT test cases. Additionally, Tucker Attention encompasses GQA, MLA, MHA as special cases and is fully compatible with flash-attention and rotary position embeddings (RoPE). This generalization strategy yields insights of the actual ranks achieved by MHA, GQA, and MLA, and further enables simplifications for MLA.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fedab07b-102c-48e8-b2f6-9eb8fa2dbeb8Builds on6
- FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-AwarenessTri Dao, Daniel Y. Fu, Stefano Ermon, Atri Rudra et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 5,493 citations
- Big Bird: Transformers for Longer SequencesManzil Zaheer, Guru Guruganesh, Kumar Avinava Dubey, Joshua Ainslie et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,159 citations
- FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work PartitioningTri DaoICLR 2024 · 2,600 citations
- On Identifiability in TransformersGino Brunner, Yang Liu, Damian Pascual, Oliver Richter et al.ICLR 2020 · 210 citations
- Low-Rank Bottleneck in Multi-head Attention ModelsSrinadh Bhojanapalli, Chulhee Yun, Ankit Singh Rawat, Sashank J. Reddi et al.ICML 2020 · 130 citations
Related papers
- Latent-Condensed Transformer for Efficient Long Context ModelingZeng You, Yaofo Chen, Qiuwu Chen, Ying Sun et al.ACL 2026
- Towards Economical Inference: Enabling DeepSeek's Multi-Head Latent Attention in Any Transformer-based LLMsTao Ji, Bin Guo, Yuanbin Wu, Qipeng Guo et al.ACL 2025
- CARE: Covariance-Aware and Rank-Enhanced Decomposition for Enabling Multi-Head Latent AttentionZhongzhu Zhou, Fengxiang Bie, Ziyan Chen, Zhenyu Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Multi-head Temporal Latent AttentionKeqi Deng, Philip C. WoodlandNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Tensor Product Attention Is All You NeedYifan Zhang, Yifeng Liu, Huizhuo Yuan, Zhen Qin et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 48 citations
