Getting Your Facebook Affairs in Order: User Expectations in Post-mortem Profile Management
Katie Z. Gach, Jed R. Brubaker
Abstract
Legacy Contact is a Facebook feature that allows account holders to choose someone to manage their profile after they have died. This study evaluates the Legacy Contact setup process, and asks how users form and communicate expectations about what an active post-mortem manager's responsibilities would be. We conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with adult Facebook account holders in the US who either configured their own settings or were chosen for future delegation by someone else. We found that account holders chose the Facebook Friend they felt closest to, and that selection was often reciprocated. Both account holders and legacy contacts felt confident that they had communicated (or could communicate) well about the legacy contact's responsibilities, but their expectations did not align with the actual functionality of the Legacy Contact system. We argue that the misalignment of user expectations and system functionality indicates a failed setup process. Our findings suggest that post-mortem management systems require a setup process that is fundamentally different from the quick-clickthrough standards of everyday interaction design. The ramifications of a post-mortem manager's expectations not being met during a time of grief, points to the urgent need for a setup process that prompts thoughtfulness and deliberation, and forms accurate expectations for account holders and future post-mortem managers alike.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e3074a63-3689-4574-ba34-b9d2080429f2Cited by top-tier papers7
- Digital Legacy: A Systematic Literature ReviewDylan Thomas Doyle, Jed R. BrubakerCSCW 2023 · 53 citations
- Generative Ghosts: Anticipating Benefits and Risks of AI AfterlivesMeredith Ringel Morris, Jed R. BrubakerCHI 2025 · 42 citations
- "AI Afterlife" as Digital Legacy: Perceptions, Expectations, and ConcernsYing Lei, Shuai Ma, Yuling Sun, Xiaojuan MaCHI 2025 · 24 citations
- Designing Anekdota: Investigating Personal Metadata for LegacyMichael Nørgaard Jørgensen, Tom JenkinsCHI 2023 · 13 citations
- Mental Health Impacts of AI Companions: Triangulating Social Media Quasi-Experiments, User Perspectives, and Relational LensYunhao Yuan, Jiaxun Zhang, Talayeh Aledavood, Renwen Zhang et al.CHI 2026 · 8 citations
Related papers
- Passing Down Passwords: How Older Adults Approach Postmortem Account Access and Digital Estate PlanningJenny Tang, Xiaoyuan Wu, Lujo Bauer, Nicolas Christin et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Digital Legacy Systems for Young Adults: Emphasizing Relationship-Oriented Perspectives and Physical Artifacts in Death PreparationSoonho Kwon, Hyunah Jo, Sohee Ryu, Jihwan Ryan Do et al.CHI 2025 · 3 citations
- Designing for the Bittersweet: Improving Sensitive Experiences with Recommender SystemsCaitlin Lustig, Artie Konrad, Jed R. BrubakerCHI 2022 · 24 citations
- From Personal Data to Digital Legacy: Exploring Conflicts in the Sharing, Security and Privacy of Post-mortem DataJack Holt, James Nicholson, Jan David SmeddinckWWW 2021 · 35 citations
- What Happens After Death? Using a Design Workbook to Understand User Expectations for Preparing their DataJanet X. Chen, Francesco Vitale, Joanna McGrenereCHI 2021 · 45 citations
