What Happens After Death? Using a Design Workbook to Understand User Expectations for Preparing their Data
Janet X. Chen, Francesco Vitale, Joanna McGrenere
Abstract
Digital data has become a key part of everyday life: people manage increasingly large and disparate collections of photos, documents, media, etc. But what happens after death? How can users select and prepare what data to leave behind before their eventual death? To explore how to support users, we first ran an ideation workshop to generate design ideas; then, we created a design workbook with 12 speculative concepts that explore diverging approaches and perspectives. We elicited reactions to the concepts from 20 participants (18-81, varied occupations). We found that participants anticipated different types of motivation at different life stages, wished for tools to feel personal and intimate, and preferred individual control on their post-death self-representation. They also found comprehensive data replicas creepy and saw smart assistants as potential aides for suggesting meaningful data. Based on the results, we discuss key directions for designing more personalized and respectful death-preparation tools.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c74ca790-eaf5-4a53-a51c-831eb3dec898Cited by top-tier papers14
- Trauma-Informed Computing: Towards Safer Technology Experiences for AllJanet X. Chen, Allison McDonald, Yixin Zou, Emily Tseng et al.CHI 2022 · 163 citations
- Digital Legacy: A Systematic Literature ReviewDylan Thomas Doyle, Jed R. BrubakerCSCW 2023 · 53 citations
- Speculating on Risks of AI Clones to Selfhood and Relationships: Doppelganger-phobia, Identity Fragmentation, and Living MemoriesPatrick Yung Kang Lee, Ning F. Ma, Ig-Jae Kim, Dongwook YoonCSCW 2023 · 46 citations
- Generative Ghosts: Anticipating Benefits and Risks of AI AfterlivesMeredith Ringel Morris, Jed R. BrubakerCHI 2025 · 42 citations
- "AI Afterlife" as Digital Legacy: Perceptions, Expectations, and ConcernsYing Lei, Shuai Ma, Yuling Sun, Xiaojuan MaCHI 2025 · 24 citations
Builds on3
- Random, Messy, Funny, Raw: Finstas as Intimate Reconfigurations of Social MediaSijia Xiao, Danaë Metaxa, Joon Sung Park, Karrie Karahalios et al.CHI 2020 · 70 citations
- IoT Data in the Home: Observing Entanglements and Drawing New EncountersAudrey Desjardins, Heidi R. Biggs, Cayla Key, Jeremy E. VinyCHI 2020 · 64 citations
- Exploring Nudge Designs to Help Adolescent SNS Users Avoid Privacy and Safety ThreatsHiroaki Masaki, Kengo Shibata, Shui Hoshino, Takahiro Ishihama et al.CHI 2020 · 62 citations
Related papers
- Digital Legacy Systems for Young Adults: Emphasizing Relationship-Oriented Perspectives and Physical Artifacts in Death PreparationSoonho Kwon, Hyunah Jo, Sohee Ryu, Jihwan Ryan Do et al.CHI 2025 · 3 citations
- From Personal Data to Digital Legacy: Exploring Conflicts in the Sharing, Security and Privacy of Post-mortem DataJack Holt, James Nicholson, Jan David SmeddinckWWW 2021 · 35 citations
- Dying, Death, and the Afterlife in Human-Computer Interaction. A Scoping ReviewRuben Albers, Shadan Sadeghian, Matthias Laschke, Marc HassenzahlCHI 2023 · 41 citations
- Crafting Remembrance Beyond the Self: Older Adults' Digital and Material LegaciesRamprabu Thangaraj, Jed R. Brubaker, Emma Dixon, Alisha PradhanCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- "I Am So Overwhelmed I Don't Know Where to Begin!" Towards Developing Relationship-Based and Values-Based End-of-Life Data Planning ApproachesDylan Thomas Doyle, Jed R. BrubakerCHI 2024 · 10 citations
