The Hardness Analysis of Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-bandits with Greedy Oracle
Fang Kong, Yueran Yang, Wei Chen, Shuai Li
Abstract
Thompson sampling (TS) has attracted a lot of interest in the bandit area. It was introduced in the 1930s but has not been theoretically proven until recent years. All of its analysis in the combinatorial multi-armed bandit (CMAB) setting requires an exact oracle to provide optimal solutions with any input. However, such an oracle is usually not feasible since many combinatorial optimization problems are NP-hard and only approximation oracles are available. An example (Wang and Chen, 2018) has shown the failure of TS to learn with an approximation oracle. However, this oracle is uncommon and is designed only for a specific problem instance. It is still an open question whether the convergence analysis of TS can be extended beyond the exact oracle in CMAB. In this paper, we study this question under the greedy oracle, which is a common (approximation) oracle with theoretical guarantees to solve many (offline) combinatorial optimization problems. We provide a problem-dependent regret lower bound of order to quantify the hardness of TS to solve CMAB problems with greedy oracle, where is the time horizon and is some reward gap. We also provide an almost matching regret upper bound. These are the first theoretical results for TS to solve CMAB with a common approximation oracle and break the misconception that TS cannot work with approximation oracles.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e2b54f9d-4843-4b49-88a5-ef01801b6b99Cited by top-tier papers5
- When Combinatorial Thompson Sampling meets Approximation RegretPierre PerraultNeurIPS 2022 · 9 citations
- FedRTS: Federated Robust Pruning via Combinatorial Thompson SamplingHong Huang, Jinhai Yang, Yuan Chen, Jiaxun Ye et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Neural Combinatorial Clustered Bandits for Recommendation SystemsBaran Atalar, Carlee Joe-WongAAAI 2025 · 4 citations
- Matroid Semi-Bandits in Sublinear TimeRuo-Chun Tzeng, Naoto Ohsaka, Kaito AriuICML 2024 · 2 citations
- Bandit Learning in Matching Markets Robust to Adversarial CorruptionsZheshun Wu, Jinhang Zuo, Zenglin Xu, Fang KongICLR 2026
Builds on2
Related papers
- Thompson Sampling for (Combinatorial) Pure ExplorationSiwei Wang, Jun ZhuICML 2022 · 8 citations
- On the Suboptimality of Thompson Sampling in High DimensionsRaymond Zhang, Richard CombesNeurIPS 2021 · 6 citations
- Thompson Sampling for Real-Valued Combinatorial Pure Exploration of Multi-Armed BanditShintaro Nakamura, Masashi SugiyamaAAAI 2024 · 7 citations
- MOTS: Minimax Optimal Thompson SamplingTianyuan Jin, Pan Xu, Jieming Shi, Xiaokui Xiao et al.ICML 2021 · 37 citations
- Query-Efficient Correlation Clustering with Noisy OracleYuko Kuroki, Atsushi Miyauchi, Francesco Bonchi, Wei ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 11 citations
