VES-RFT: Rewarding Visual Evidence Sensitivity to Mitigate Hallucinations in Large Vision–Language Models
XUEGE HOU, Wenshuo Li, Yali Li, Han Shu, Yuan Wang, Xinghao Chen, Shengjin Wang
Abstract
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) often over-rely on linguistic priors even when images are provided, leading to object hallucinations. We revisit object-wise hallucination from the perspective of how visual evidence shapes the model’s uncertainty. For each input, we measure decision uncertainty with and without the image, and define a Visual Evidence Sensitivity (VES) signal as the image-attributable change in entropy. Building on this signal, we introduce Visual Evidence Sensitivity Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (VES-RFT), a training-time reinforcement fine-tuning method that explicitly rewards reliance on correct visual evidence. We pair this continuous, annotation-free signal with a verifiable reward that enforces factual object correctness by automatically checking generated object mentions against the image, yielding a computable objective without human annotations. We optimize the dual objective using critic-free GRPO with KL regularization, requiring only parallel image and no-image passes during training while preserving single-pass inference. Across multiple VLM families and benchmarks, VES-RFT consistently suppresses hallucinations and improves robustness under ambiguity without degrading general language ability. Specifically, on LLaVA-7B, VES-RFT reduces 12.8 and 1.8 on CHAIR/CHAIR of MS-COCO, and increases POPE accuracy by 4.92%. Extensive experiments indicate that turning uncertainty into a learnable reward, paired with verifiable correctness signals, provides a scalable mechanism for training-time hallucination mitigation and stronger visual grounding.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on16
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction TuningWenliang Dai, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Meng Huat Tiong et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,013 citations
- MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language ModelsDeyao Zhu, Jun Chen, Xiaoqian Shen, Xiang Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,079 citations
- Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language ModelsYifan Li, Yifan Du, Kun Zhou, Jinpeng Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 344 citations
Related papers
- Imitating the Truth: Attention-aware Truth-Guided Enhancement for Hallucination Mitigation in Large Vision-Language ModelsHairui Ren, Zixuan Wang, Yibo Yang, He Zhao et al.ICLR 2026
- Improving Vision-language Models with Perception-centric Process Reward ModelsYingqian Min, Kun Zhou, Yifan Li, Yuhuan Wu et al.CVPR 2026 · 3 citations
- Collaboration Wins More: Dual-Modal Collaborative Attention Reinforcement for Mitigating Large Vision Language Models HallucinationJiye Xie, Yifei Gao, Liangliang You, Xiang Xu et al.ACM MM 2025 · 2 citations
- One Token, Two Fates: A Unified Framework via Vision Token Manipulation Against MLLMs HallucinationZhan Fa, Yue Duan, Jian Zhang, Lei Qi et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- CEBC: Conformal Evidence-Bounded Control for Low-Hallucination Vision-Language GenerationAshish Mishra, Tarun Kumar, Arpit Shah, Suparna Bhattacharya et al.ACL 2026
