One Token, Two Fates: A Unified Framework via Vision Token Manipulation Against MLLMs Hallucination
Zhan Fa, Yue Duan, Jian Zhang, Lei Qi, Yinghuan Shi
Abstract
Current training-free methods tackle MLLM hallucination with separate strategies: either enhancing visual signals or suppressing text inertia. However, these separate methods are insufficient due to critical trade-offs: simply enhancing vision often fails against strong language prior, while suppressing language can introduce extra image-irrelevant noise. Moreover, we find their naive combination is also ineffective, necessitating a unified framework . We propose such a framework by focusing on the core asset: the vision token. Our design leverages two key insights: (1) augmented images offer complementary visual semantics, and (2) removing vision tokens (information-gap) isolates hallucination tendencies more precisely than distorting images (modality-gap). Based on these, our framework uses vision tokens in two distinct ways, both operating on latent representations: our Synergistic Visual Calibration (SVC) module incorporates augmented tokens to strengthen visual representations, while our Causal Representation Calibration (CRC) module uses pruned tokens to create latent-space negative samples for correcting internal model biases. By harmonizing these two roles, our framework effectively restores the vision-language balance, significantly reducing object hallucinations, improving POPE accuracy by an average of 2% absolute on LLaVA-1.5 across multiple benchmarks with only a 1.06x inference latency overhead. Codes are available in supplementary materials.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 999d4eda-e877-40ba-9856-910e8d8c1ecdCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on28
- InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction TuningWenliang Dai, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Meng Huat Tiong et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,013 citations
- MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language ModelsDeyao Zhu, Jun Chen, Xiaoqian Shen, Xiang Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,079 citations
- Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language ModelsYifan Li, Yifan Du, Kun Zhou, Jinpeng Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 344 citations
- Grounding Language with Vision: A Conditional Mutual Information Calibrated Decoding Strategy for Reducing Hallucinations in LVLMsHao Fang, Changle Zhou, Jiawei Kong, Kuofeng Gao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 25 citations
- VisiPruner: Decoding Discontinuous Cross-Modal Dynamics for Efficient Multimodal LLMsYingqi Fan, Anhao Zhao, Jinlan Fu, Junlong Tong et al.EMNLP 2025 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Imitating the Truth: Attention-aware Truth-Guided Enhancement for Hallucination Mitigation in Large Vision-Language ModelsHairui Ren, Zixuan Wang, Yibo Yang, He Zhao et al.ICLR 2026
- Vision-Language Introspection: Mitigating Overconfident Hallucinations in MLLMs via Interpretable Bi-Causal SteeringShuliang Liu, Songbo Yang, Dong Fang, Sihang Jia et al.ACL 2026 · 9 citations
- Multi-Modal Hallucination Control by Visual Information GroundingAlessandro Favero, Luca Zancato, Matthew Trager, Siddharth Choudhary et al.CVPR 2024
- Tell Model Where to Look: Mitigating Hallucinations in MLLMs by Vision-Guided AttentionJianfei Zhao, Feng Zhang, Xin Sun, Chong Feng et al.CVPR 2026 · 6 citations
- Breaking the Illusion: When Positive Meets Negative in Multimodal DecodingYubo Jiang, Yitong An, Xin Yang, Abudukelimu Wuerkaixi et al.CVPR 2026 · 1 citation
