Unveiling Attractor Cycles in Large Language Models: A Dynamical Systems View of Successive Paraphrasing
Zhilin Wang, Yafu Li, Jianhao Yan, Yu Cheng, Yue Zhang
Abstract
Dynamical systems theory provides a framework for analyzing iterative processes and evolution over time. Within such systems, repetitive transformations can lead to stable configurations, known as attractors, including fixed points and limit cycles. Applying this perspective to large language models (LLMs), which iteratively map input text to output text, provides a principled approach to characterizing long-term behaviors. Successive paraphrasing serves as a compelling testbed for exploring such dynamics, as paraphrases re-express the same underlying meaning with linguistic variation. Although LLMs are expected to explore a diverse set of paraphrases in the text space, our study reveals that successive paraphrasing converges to stable periodic states, such as 2-period attractor cycles, limiting linguistic diversity. This phenomenon is attributed to the self-reinforcing nature of LLMs, as they iteratively favour and amplify certain textual forms over others. This pattern persists with increasing generation randomness or alternating prompts and LLMs. These findings underscore inherent constraints in LLM generative capability, while offering a novel dynamical systems perspective for studying their expressive potential.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e278a34a-16d7-42d3-b82a-5d0d124112c5Cited by top-tier papers2
- Paraphrasing as Zero-shot Translation with Feature-guided Diversity EnhancementZiyue Yan, Hongying Zan, Xinglin Lyu, Hongfei XuACL 2026
- Persistent Semantic Entities in Tool-Augmented LLM SystemsZhaohui WangICML 2026
Builds on15
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Neural Text Generation With Unlikelihood TrainingSean Welleck, Ilia Kulikov, Stephen Roller, Emily Dinan et al.ICLR 2020 · 683 citations
- Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defenseKalpesh Krishna, Yixiao Song, Marzena Karpinska, John Wieting et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 657 citations
- Pre-training via ParaphrasingMike Lewis, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Gargi Ghosh, Armen Aghajanyan et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 165 citations
Related papers
- LLM as a Broken Telephone: Iterative Generation Distorts InformationAmr Mohamed, Mingmeng Geng, Michalis Vazirgiannis, Guokan ShangACL 2025
- In-Context Learning Dynamics with Random Binary SequencesEric J. Bigelow, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Robert P. Dick, Hidenori Tanaka et al.ICLR 2024 · 13 citations
- When LLMs Play the Telephone Game: Cultural Attractors as Conceptual Tools to Evaluate LLMs in Multi-turn SettingsJérémy Perez, Grgur Kovac, Corentin Léger, Cédric Colas et al.ICLR 2025
- Not All Answers Are Contextually Persuadable: Inference Dynamics in Large Language Models under Contextual InfluenceZongye Hu, Weiqing Luo, Yanjie Fu, Yu Gan et al.ICML 2026
- A Ship of Theseus: Curious Cases of Paraphrasing in LLM-Generated TextsNafis Irtiza Tripto, Saranya Venkatraman, Dominik Macko, Róbert Móro et al.ACL 2024
