VBridge: Connecting the Dots Between Features and Data to Explain Healthcare Models
Furui Cheng, Dongyu Liu, Fan Du, Yanna Lin, Alexandra Zytek, Haomin Li, Huamin Qu, Kalyan Veeramachaneni
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is increasingly applied to Electronic Health Records (EHRs) to solve clinical prediction tasks. Although many ML models perform promisingly, issues with model transparency and interpretability limit their adoption in clinical practice. Directly using existing explainable ML techniques in clinical settings can be challenging. Through literature surveys and collaborations with six clinicians with an average of 17 years of clinical experience, we identified three key challenges, including clinicians' unfamiliarity with ML features, lack of contextual information, and the need for cohort-level evidence. Following an iterative design process, we further designed and developed VBridge, a visual analytics tool that seamlessly incorporates ML explanations into clinicians' decision-making workflow. The system includes a novel hierarchical display of contribution-based feature explanations and enriched interactions that connect the dots between ML features, explanations, and data. We demonstrated the effectiveness of VBridge through two case studies and expert interviews with four clinicians, showing that visually associating model explanations with patients' situational records can help clinicians better interpret and use model predictions when making clinician decisions. We further derived a list of design implications for developing future explainable ML tools to support clinical decision-making.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers11
- Extending the Nested Model for User-Centric XAI: A Design Study on GNN-based Drug RepurposingQianwen Wang, Kexin Huang, Payal Chandak, Marinka Zitnik et al.IEEE VIS 2022 · 83 citations
- On Selective, Mutable and Dialogic XAI: a Review of What Users Say about Different Types of Interactive ExplanationsAstrid Bertrand, Tiphaine Viard, Rafik Belloum, James R. Eagan et al.CHI 2023 · 53 citations
- RELIC: Investigating Large Language Model Responses using Self-ConsistencyFurui Cheng, Vilém Zouhar, Simran Arora, Mrinmaya Sachan et al.CHI 2024 · 37 citations
- In Defence of Visual Analytics Systems: Replies to CriticsAoyu Wu, Dazhen Deng, Furui Cheng, Yingcai Wu et al.IEEE VIS 2022 · 30 citations
- MTV: Visual Analytics for Detecting, Investigating, and Annotating Anomalies in Multivariate Time SeriesDongyu Liu, Sarah Alnegheimish, Alexandra Zytek, Kalyan VeeramachaneniCSCW 2022 · 28 citations
Builds on3
- DECE: Decision Explorer with Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning ModelsFurui Cheng, Yao Ming, Huamin QuIEEE VIS 2020 · 118 citations
- Towards Better Bus Networks: A Visual Analytics ApproachDi Weng, Chengbo Zheng, Zikun Deng, Mingze Ma et al.IEEE VIS 2020 · 74 citations
- Towards Understanding How Readers Integrate Charts and Captions: A Case Study with Line ChartsDae Hyun Kim, Vidya Setlur, Maneesh AgrawalaCHI 2021 · 52 citations
Related papers
- Sibyl: Understanding and Addressing the Usability Challenges of Machine Learning In High-Stakes Decision MakingAlexandra Zytek, Dongyu Liu, Rhema Vaithianathan, Kalyan VeeramachaneniIEEE VIS 2021 · 62 citations
- VIME: Visual Interactive Model Explorer for Identifying Capabilities and Limitations of Machine Learning Models for Sequential Decision-MakingAnindya Das Antar, Somayeh Molaei, Yan-Ying Chen, Matthew L. Lee et al.UIST 2024 · 3 citations
- Are We Closing the Loop Yet? Gaps in the Generalizability of VIS4ML ResearchHariharan Subramonyam, Jessica HullmanIEEE VIS 2023 · 10 citations
- SaCal: An Efficient Saliency-Guided Causal Framework for Interpretable Healthcare AnalyticsFeixuan Lin, Chenyu You, Zhongle Xie, Zhaojing Luo et al.ICDE 2026
- HypoML: Visual Analysis for Hypothesis-based Evaluation of Machine Learning ModelsQianwen Wang, William Alexander, Jack Pegg, Huamin Qu et al.IEEE VIS 2020 · 17 citations
