Sibyl: Understanding and Addressing the Usability Challenges of Machine Learning In High-Stakes Decision Making
Alexandra Zytek, Dongyu Liu, Rhema Vaithianathan, Kalyan Veeramachaneni
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is being applied to a diverse and ever-growing set of domains. In many cases, domain experts - who often have no expertise in ML or data science - are asked to use ML predictions to make high-stakes decisions. Multiple ML usability challenges can appear as result, such as lack of user trust in the model, inability to reconcile human-ML disagreement, and ethical concerns about oversimplification of complex problems to a single algorithm output. In this paper, we investigate the ML usability challenges that present in the domain of child welfare screening through a series of collaborations with child welfare screeners. Following the iterative design process between the ML scientists, visualization researchers, and domain experts (child screeners), we first identified four key ML challenges and honed in on one promising explainable ML technique to address them (local factor contributions). Then we implemented and evaluated our visual analytics tool, Sibyl, to increase the interpretability and interactivity of local factor contributions. The effectiveness of our tool is demonstrated by two formal user studies with 12 non-expert participants and 13 expert participants respectively. Valuable feedback was collected, from which we composed a list of design implications as a useful guideline for researchers who aim to develop an interpretable and interactive visualization tool for ML prediction models deployed for child welfare screeners and other similar domain experts.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5e9b72a3-0fed-4234-a427-35b42933b95cCited by top-tier papers12
- Improving Human-AI Partnerships in Child Welfare: Understanding Worker Practices, Challenges, and Desires for Algorithmic Decision SupportAnna Kawakami, Venkatesh Sivaraman, Hao Fei Cheng, Logan Stapleton et al.CHI 2022 · 137 citations
- Ignore, Trust, or Negotiate: Understanding Clinician Acceptance of AI-Based Treatment Recommendations in Health CareVenkatesh Sivaraman, Leigh A. Bukowski, Joel Levin, Jeremy M. Kahn et al.CHI 2023 · 126 citations
- Extending the Nested Model for User-Centric XAI: A Design Study on GNN-based Drug RepurposingQianwen Wang, Kexin Huang, Payal Chandak, Marinka Zitnik et al.IEEE VIS 2022 · 83 citations
- Who Do We Mean When We Talk About Visualization Novices?Alyxander Burns, Christiana Lee, Ria Chawla, Evan Peck et al.CHI 2023 · 38 citations
- Evaluating the Impact of Human Explanation Strategies on Human-AI Visual Decision-MakingKatelyn Morrison, Donghoon Shin, Kenneth Holstein, Adam PererCSCW 2023 · 36 citations
Related papers
- VBridge: Connecting the Dots Between Features and Data to Explain Healthcare ModelsFurui Cheng, Dongyu Liu, Fan Du, Yanna Lin et al.IEEE VIS 2021 · 54 citations
- Interpreting Interpretability: Understanding Data Scientists' Use of Interpretability Tools for Machine LearningHarmanpreet Kaur, Harsha Nori, Samuel Jenkins, Rich Caruana et al.CHI 2020 · 541 citations
- How Child Welfare Workers Reduce Racial Disparities in Algorithmic DecisionsHao Fei Cheng, Logan Stapleton, Anna Kawakami, Venkatesh Sivaraman et al.CHI 2022 · 84 citations
- EXMOS: Explanatory Model Steering through Multifaceted Explanations and Data ConfigurationsAditya Bhattacharya, Simone Stumpf, Lucija Gosak, Gregor Stiglic et al.CHI 2024 · 38 citations
- Your Model Is Unfair, Are You Even Aware? Inverse Relationship Between Comprehension and Trust in Explainability Visualizations of Biased ML ModelsZhanna Kaufman, Madeline Endres, Cindy Xiong Bearfield, Yuriy BrunIEEE VIS 2025 · 2 citations
