Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness of Adaptive Test-time Defenses
Francesco Croce, Sven Gowal, Thomas Brunner, Evan Shelhamer, Matthias Hein, A. Taylan Cemgil
Abstract
Adaptive defenses, which optimize at test time, promise to improve adversarial robustness. We categorize such adaptive test-time defenses, explain their potential benefits and drawbacks, and evaluate a representative variety of the latest adaptive defenses for image classification. Unfortunately, none significantly improve upon static defenses when subjected to our careful case study evaluation. Some even weaken the underlying static model while simultaneously increasing inference computation. While these results are disappointing, we still believe that adaptive test-time defenses are a promising avenue of research and, as such, we provide recommendations for their thorough evaluation. We extend the checklist of Carlini et al. ( 2019 ) by providing concrete steps specific to adaptive defenses.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e246f573-d777-4233-a0a3-73dc629b6c94Cited by top-tier papers35
- Diffusion Models for Adversarial PurificationWeili Nie, Brandon Guo, Yujia Huang, Chaowei Xiao et al.ICML 2022 · 663 citations
- Better Diffusion Models Further Improve Adversarial TrainingZekai Wang, Tianyu Pang, Chao Du, Min Lin et al.ICML 2023 · 300 citations
- Robust Evaluation of Diffusion-Based Adversarial PurificationMinjong Lee, Dongwoo KimICCV 2023 · 96 citations
- Understanding Robust Overfitting of Adversarial Training and BeyondChaojian Yu, Bo Han, Li Shen, Jun Yu et al.ICML 2022 · 78 citations
- DISCO: Adversarial Defense with Local Implicit FunctionsChih-Hui Ho, Nuno VasconcelosNeurIPS 2022 · 65 citations
Builds on27
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural NetworksNicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha et al.S&P 2016 · 3,275 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Tent: Fully Test-Time Adaptation by Entropy MinimizationDequan Wang, Evan Shelhamer, Shaoteng Liu, Bruno A. Olshausen et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,731 citations
- Improved Techniques for Training Score-Based Generative ModelsYang Song, Stefano ErmonNeurIPS 2020 · 1,527 citations
Related papers
- On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example DefensesFlorian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Wieland Brendel, Aleksander MadryNeurIPS 2020 · 1,026 citations
- Embracing Adaptation: An Effective Dynamic Defense Strategy Against Adversarial ExamplesShenglin Yin, Kelu Yao, Zhen Xiao, Jieyi LongACM MM 2024
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks Learned by TransductionJiefeng Chen, Xi Wu, Yang Guo, Yingyu Liang et al.ICLR 2022 · 19 citations
- Indicators of Attack Failure: Debugging and Improving Optimization of Adversarial ExamplesMaura Pintor, Luca Demetrio, Angelo Sotgiu, Ambra Demontis et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 39 citations
- You Don't Protect if You Don't Expect: Breaking the Key Assumption behind CLIP's Test-Time DefensesRuize Zhang, Yu Li, Zhang Wan, Juan Cao et al.ICML 2026
