Generalized Proof of Liabilities
Yan Ji, Konstantinos Chalkias
Abstract
Proof of liabilities (PoL) allows a prover to prove his/her liabilities to a group of verifiers. This is a cryptographic primitive once used only for proving financial solvency but is also applicable to domains outside finance, including transparent and private donations, new algorithms for disapproval voting and publicly verifiable official reports such as COVID-19 daily cases. These applications share a common nature in incentives: it's not in the prover's interest to increase his/her total liabilities. We generalize PoL for these applications by attempting for the first time to standardize the goals it should achieve from security, privacy and efficiency perspectives. We also propose DAPOL+, a concrete PoL scheme extending the state-of-the-art DAPOL protocol but providing provable security and privacy, with benchmark results demonstrating its practicality. In addition, we explore techniques to provide additional features that might be desired in different applications of PoL and measure the asymptotic probability of failure.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e144bc46-2667-42e0-a0df-f403202fe9faCited by top-tier papers4
- Notus: Dynamic Proofs of Liabilities from Zero-knowledge RSA AccumulatorsJiajun Xin, Arman Haghighi, Xiangan Tian, Dimitrios PapadopoulosUSENIX Security 2024 · 11 citations
- Short Privacy-Preserving Proofs of LiabilitiesFrancesca Falzon, Kaoutar Elkhiyaoui, Yacov Manevich, Angelo De CaroCCS 2023 · 6 citations
- Distributed Vector Commitments and Their ApplicationsRui Gao, Huaqun Wang, Zhiguo Wan, Yuncong HuUSENIX Security 2026
- TAP: Transparent and Privacy-Preserving Data ServicesDaniël Reijsbergen, Aung Maw, Zheng Yang, Tien Tuan Anh Dinh et al.USENIX Security 2023
Builds on5
- Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and MoreBenedikt Bünz, Jonathan Bootle, Dan Boneh, Andrew Poelstra et al.S&P 2018 · 1,285 citations
- Ligero: Lightweight Sublinear Arguments Without a Trusted SetupScott Ames, Carmit Hazay, Yuval Ishai, Muthuramakrishnan VenkitasubramaniamCCS 2017 · 338 citations
- Solidus: Confidential Distributed Ledger Transactions via PVORMEthan Cecchetti, Fan Zhang, Yan Ji, Ahmed E. Kosba et al.CCS 2017 · 128 citations
- SEEMless: Secure End-to-End Encrypted Messaging with less</> TrustMelissa Chase, Apoorvaa Deshpande, Esha Ghosh, Harjasleen MalvaiCCS 2019 · 69 citations
- Tight State-Restoration Soundness in the Algebraic Group ModelAshrujit Ghoshal, Stefano TessaroCRYPTO 2021 · 27 citations
Related papers
- B-Privacy: Defining and Enforcing Privacy in Weighted VotingSamuel Breckenridge, Dani Vilardell, Andrés Fábrega, Amy Zhao et al.USENIX Security 2026 · 2 citations
- Machine-Checked Proofs of Privacy for Electronic Voting ProtocolsVéronique Cortier, Constantin Catalin Dragan, François Dupressoir, Benedikt Schmidt et al.S&P 2017 · 50 citations
- Anonymous Public-Key Quantum Money and Universally Verifiable Quantum VotingAlper Çakan, Vipul Goyal, Takashi YamakawaCRYPTO 2026
- GZKP: A GPU Accelerated Zero-Knowledge Proof SystemWeiliang Ma, Qian Xiong, Xuanhua Shi, Xiaosong Ma et al.ASPLOS 2023 · 47 citations
- Efficient Publicly Verifiable 2PC over a Blockchain with Applications to Financially-Secure ComputationsRuiyu Zhu, Changchang Ding, Yan HuangCCS 2019 · 21 citations
