USENIX Security2023Top-tier venue
TAP: Transparent and Privacy-Preserving Data Services
Daniël Reijsbergen, Aung Maw, Zheng Yang, Tien Tuan Anh Dinh, Jianying Zhou
Abstract
Users today expect more security from services that handle their data. In addition to traditional data privacy and integrity requirements, they expect transparency, i.e., that the service's processing of the data is verifiable by users and trusted auditors. Our goal is to build a multi-user system that provides data privacy, integrity, and transparency for a large number of operations, while achieving practical performance. To this end, we first identify the limitations of existing approaches that use authenticated data structures. We find that they fall into two categories: 1) those that hide each user's data from other users, but have a limited range of verifiable operations (e.g., CONIKS, Merkle2, and Proofs of Liabilities), and 2) those that support a wide range of verifiable operations, but make all data publicly visible (e.g., IntegriDB and FalconDB). We then present TAP to address the above limitations. The key component of TAP is a novel tree data structure that supports efficient result verification, and relies on independent audits that use zero-knowledge range proofs to show that the tree is constructed correctly without revealing user data. TAP supports a broad range of verifiable operations, including quantiles and sample standard deviations. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of TAP, and compare it against two state-of-the-art baselines, namely IntegriDB and Merkle2, showing that the system is practical at scale.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 34ec0384-dac9-4e56-8af8-e6a5464ba097Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and MoreBenedikt Bünz, Jonathan Bootle, Dan Boneh, Andrew Poelstra et al.S&P 2018 · 1,285 citations
- vSQL: Verifying Arbitrary SQL Queries over Dynamic Outsourced DatabasesYupeng Zhang, Daniel Genkin, Jonathan Katz, Dimitrios Papadopoulos et al.S&P 2017 · 206 citations
- Tracing Information Flows Between Ad Exchanges Using Retargeted AdsMuhammad Ahmad Bashir, Sajjad Arshad, William K. Robertson, Christo WilsonUSENIX Security 2016 · 132 citations
- FalconDB: Blockchain-based Collaborative DatabaseYanqing Peng, Min Du, Feifei Li, Raymond Cheng et al.SIGMOD 2020 · 119 citations
Related papers
- GlassDB: An Efficient Verifiable Ledger Database System Through TransparencyCong Yue, Tien Tuan Anh Dinh, Zhongle Xie, Meihui Zhang et al.VLDB 2023 · 26 citations
- Architecting Trigger-Action Platforms for Security, Performance and FunctionalityDeepak Sirone Jegan, Michael M. Swift, Earlence FernandesNDSS 2024
- Parakeet: Practical Key Transparency for End-to-End Encrypted MessagingHarjasleen Malvai, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alberto Sonnino, Esha Ghosh et al.NDSS 2023
- Merkle2: A Low-Latency Transparency Log SystemYuncong Hu, Kian Hooshmand, Harika Kalidhindi, Seung Jin Yang et al.S&P 2021 · 51 citations
- FastVer: Making Data Integrity a CommodityArvind Arasu, Badrish Chandramouli, Johannes Gehrke, Esha Ghosh et al.SIGMOD 2021 · 15 citations
