Gradual Optimization Learning for Conformational Energy Minimization
Artem Tsypin, Leonid Ugadiarov, Kuzma Khrabrov, Alexander Telepov, Egor Rumiantsev, Alexey Skrynnik, Aleksandr Panov, Dmitry P. Vetrov, Elena Tutubalina, Artur Kadurin
Abstract
Molecular conformation optimization is crucial to computer-aided drug discovery and materials design. Traditional energy minimization techniques rely on iterative optimization methods that use molecular forces calculated by a physical simulator (oracle) as anti-gradients. However, this is a computationally expensive approach that requires many interactions with a physical simulator. One way to accelerate this procedure is to replace the physical simulator with a neural network. Despite recent progress in neural networks for molecular conformation energy prediction, such models are prone to distribution shift, leading to inaccurate energy minimization. We find that the quality of energy minimization with neural networks can be improved by providing optimization trajectories as additional training data. Still, it takes around additional conformations to match the physical simulator's optimization quality. In this work, we present the Gradual Optimization Learning Framework (GOLF) for energy minimization with neural networks that significantly reduces the required additional data. The framework consists of an efficient data-collecting scheme and an external optimizer. The external optimizer utilizes gradients from the energy prediction model to generate optimization trajectories, and the data-collecting scheme selects additional training data to be processed by the physical simulator. Our results demonstrate that the neural network trained with GOLF performs on par with the oracle on a benchmark of diverse drug-like molecules using x less additional data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e1060652-bf3a-4a2b-8845-66f5c11ef6a7Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on15
- Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation?Chengxuan Ying, Tianle Cai, Shengjie Luo, Shuxin Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,632 citations
- Directional Message Passing for Molecular GraphsJohannes Klicpera, Janek Groß, Stephan GünnemannICLR 2020 · 1,079 citations
- Equivariant message passing for the prediction of tensorial properties and molecular spectraKristof Schütt, Oliver T. Unke, Michael GasteggerICML 2021 · 736 citations
- GeoDiff: A Geometric Diffusion Model for Molecular Conformation GenerationMinkai Xu, Lantao Yu, Yang Song, Chence Shi et al.ICLR 2022 · 695 citations
- GemNet: Universal Directional Graph Neural Networks for MoleculesJohannes Gasteiger, Florian Becker, Stephan GünnemannNeurIPS 2021 · 665 citations
Related papers
- Energy-Inspired Molecular Conformation OptimizationJiaqi Guan, Wesley Wei Qian, Qiang Liu, Wei-Ying Ma et al.ICLR 2022 · 27 citations
- Neural Network Reparametrization for Accelerated Optimization in Molecular SimulationsNima Dehmamy, Csaba Both, Jeet Mohapatra, Subhro Das et al.NeurIPS 2024
- Training one DeePMD Model in Minutes: a Step towards Online LearningSiyu Hu, Tong Zhao, Qiuchen Sha, Enji Li et al.PPoPP 2024 · 3 citations
- MIMOSA: Multi-constraint Molecule Sampling for Molecule OptimizationTianfan Fu, Cao Xiao, Xinhao Li, Lucas M. Glass et al.AAAI 2021 · 94 citations
- Constraint-based graph network simulatorYulia Rubanova, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Tobias Pfaff, Peter W. BattagliaICML 2022 · 34 citations
