WGFormer: An SE(3)-Transformer Driven by Wasserstein Gradient Flows for Molecular Ground-State Conformation Prediction
Fanmeng Wang, Minjie Cheng, Hongteng Xu
Abstract
Predicting molecular ground-state conformation (i.e., energy-minimized conformation) is crucial for many chemical applications such as molecular docking and property prediction. Classic energybased simulation is time-consuming when solving this problem, while existing learning-based methods have advantages in computational efficiency but sacrifice accuracy and interpretability. In this work, we propose a novel and effective method to bridge the energy-based simulation and the learning-based strategy, which designs and learns a Wasserstein gradient flow-driven SE(3)-Transformer, called WGFormer, for ground-state conformation prediction. Specifically, our method tackles this task within an auto-encoding framework, which encodes low-quality conformations by the proposed WGFormer and decodes corresponding ground-state conformations by an MLP. The architecture of WGFormer corresponds to Wasserstein gradient flows -it optimizes conformations by minimizing an energy function defined on the latent mixture models of atoms, thereby significantly improving performance and interpretability. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art competitors, providing a new and insightful paradigm to predict ground-state conformation. The code is available at https:// github.com/FanmengWang/WGFormer .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b17d81e2-db25-4beb-8e6e-437c70c662e6Cited by top-tier papers3
- Universally Invariant Learning in Equivariant GNNsJiacheng Cen, Anyi Li, Ning Lin, Tingyang Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Geometric Mixture Models for Electrolyte Conductivity PredictionAnyi Li, Jiacheng Cen, Songyou Li, Mingze Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- MuCO: Generative Peptide Cyclization Empowered by Multi-stage Conformation OptimizationYitian Wang, Zhao Yang, Angxiao Yue, Wentao Guo et al.ICML 2026
Builds on20
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural NetworksWeihua Hu, Bowen Liu, Joseph Gomes, Marinka Zitnik et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,744 citations
- How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?Shaked Brody, Uri Alon, Eran YahavICLR 2022 · 1,717 citations
- Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation?Chengxuan Ying, Tianle Cai, Shengjie Luo, Shuxin Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,632 citations
- E(n) Equivariant Graph Neural NetworksVictor Garcia Satorras, Emiel Hoogeboom, Max WellingICML 2021 · 1,432 citations
Related papers
- GTMGC: Using Graph Transformer to Predict Molecule's Ground-State ConformationGuikun Xu, Yongquan Jiang, PengChuan Lei, Yan Yang et al.ICLR 2024 · 7 citations
- Energy-Inspired Molecular Conformation OptimizationJiaqi Guan, Wesley Wei Qian, Qiang Liu, Wei-Ying Ma et al.ICLR 2022 · 27 citations
- Learning Gradient Fields for Molecular Conformation GenerationChence Shi, Shitong Luo, Minkai Xu, Jian TangICML 2021 · 247 citations
- ET-Flow: Equivariant Flow-Matching for Molecular Conformer GenerationMajdi Hassan, Nikhil Shenoy, Jungyoon Lee, Hannes Stärk et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 50 citations
- Geometric Transformer with Interatomic Positional EncodingYusong Wang, Shaoning Li, Tong Wang, Bin Shao et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 25 citations
