AdaGrad under Anisotropic Smoothness
Yuxing Liu, Rui Pan, Tong Zhang
Abstract
Adaptive gradient methods have been widely adopted in training large-scale deep neural networks, especially large foundation models. Despite the huge success in practice, their theoretical advantages over classical gradient methods with uniform step sizes across all coordinates (e.g. SGD) have not been fully understood, especially in the large batch-size setting commonly used in practice. This is because the only theoretical result that can demonstrate this benefit was obtained in the original paper of Adagrad for convex nonsmooth objective functions, which is insufficient for large batch algorithms. In this work, we attempt to resolve this gap between theory and practice by proposing a novel anisotropic generalized smoothness assumption and providing corresponding analyses of Adagrad. It is shown that under anisotropic smoothness and noise conditions, AdaGrad can achieve faster convergence guarantees in terms of better dimensional dependence than algorithms with uniform step sizes across all coordinates. Experiments in logistic regression and instruction following fine-tuning tasks provide strong evidence to support our novel assumption and theoretical analysis. * Equal contribution.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e09d5014-cfd6-4eaf-9979-1d823c2499d3Cited by top-tier papers9
- ASGO: Adaptive Structured Gradient OptimizationKang An, Yuxing Liu, Rui Pan, Yi Ren et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 58 citations
- Scaling Laws for Gradient Descent and Sign Descent for Linear Bigram Models under Zipf's LawFrederik Kunstner, Francis BachNeurIPS 2025 · 21 citations
- Error Feedback for Muon and FriendsKaja Gruntkowska, Alexander Gaponov, Zhirayr Tovmasyan, Peter RichtárikICLR 2026 · 13 citations
- SGD with Adaptive Preconditioning: Unified Analysis and Momentum AccelerationDmitry KovalevICLR 2026 · 13 citations
- On the O(√d/K1/4) Convergence Rate of AdamW Measured by ℓ1 NormHuan Li, Yiming Dong, Zhouchen LinNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
Builds on22
- Large Batch Optimization for Deep Learning: Training BERT in 76 minutesYang You, Jing Li, Sashank J. Reddi, Jonathan Hseu et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,170 citations
- Why Gradient Clipping Accelerates Training: A Theoretical Justification for AdaptivityJingzhao Zhang, Tianxing He, Suvrit Sra, Ali JadbabaieICLR 2020 · 598 citations
- Why are Adaptive Methods Good for Attention Models?Jingzhao Zhang, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Andreas Veit, Seungyeon Kim et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 397 citations
- Understanding Gradient Clipping in Private SGD: A Geometric PerspectiveXiangyi Chen, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Mingyi HongNeurIPS 2020 · 254 citations
- Stochastic Optimization with Heavy-Tailed Noise via Accelerated Gradient ClippingEduard Gorbunov, Marina Danilova, Alexander V. GasnikovNeurIPS 2020 · 181 citations
Related papers
- Error Feedback under (L0, L1)-Smoothness: Normalization and MomentumSarit Khirirat, Abdurakhmon Sadiev, Artem Riabinin, Eduard Gorbunov et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- On the Convergence of Step Decay Step-Size for Stochastic OptimizationXiaoyu Wang, Sindri Magnússon, Mikael JohanssonNeurIPS 2021 · 33 citations
- Provable Adaptivity of Adam under Non-uniform SmoothnessBohan Wang, Yushun Zhang, Huishuai Zhang, Qi Meng et al.KDD 2024 · 4 citations
- On Convergence of Adam for Stochastic Optimization under Relaxed AssumptionsYusu Hong, Junhong LinNeurIPS 2024 · 37 citations
- Special Properties of Gradient Descent with Large Learning RatesAmirkeivan Mohtashami, Martin Jaggi, Sebastian U. StichICML 2023 · 16 citations
