Decompiling the Synergy: An Empirical Study of Human-LLM Teaming in Software Reverse Engineering
Zion Leonahenahe Basque, Samuele Doria, Ananta Soneji, Wil Gibbs, Adam Doupé, Yan Shoshitaishvili, Eleonora Losiouk, Ruoyu Wang, Simone Aonzo
Abstract
—Large Language Models (LLMs) are revolutionizing fields previously dominated by human effort. This work presents the first systematic investigation of how LLMs can team with analysts during software reverse engineering (SRE). To accomplish this, we first document the state of LLMs in SRE with an online survey of 153 practitioners, and then we design a fine-grained human study on two Capture-The-Flag-style binaries representative of real-world software. In our human study, we instrumented the SRE workflow of 48 participants (split between 24 novices and 24 experts), observing over 109 hours of SRE. Through 18 findings, we found various benefits and harms of LLMs in SRE. Remarkably, we found that LLM assistance narrows the expertise gap: novices’ comprehension rate rises by approximately 98%, matching that of experts, whereas experts gain little; however, they also had harmful hallucinations, unhelpful suggestions, and ineffective results. Known-algorithm functions are triaged up to 2.4 × faster, and artifact recovery (symbols, comments, types) increases by at least 66%. Overall, our findings identify powerful synergies of humans and LLMs in SRE, but also emphasize the significant shortcomings of LLMs in their current integration.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dfc71072-5821-48c9-af44-cd10d57994b7Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on18
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Why Johnny Can't Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM PromptsJ. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, Qian YangCHI 2023 · 892 citations
- Using an LLM to Help With Code UnderstandingDaye Nam, Andrew Macvean, Vincent J. Hellendoorn, Bogdan Vasilescu et al.ICSE 2024 · 264 citations
- "An Ideal Human": Expectations of AI Teammates in Human-AI TeamingRui Zhang, Nathan J. McNeese, Guo Freeman, Geoff MusickCSCW 2020 · 222 citations
- PentestGPT: Evaluating and Harnessing Large Language Models for Automated Penetration TestingGelei Deng, Yi Liu, Víctor Mayoral Vilches, Peng Liu et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 186 citations
Related papers
- DecLLM: LLM-Augmented Recompilable Decompilation for Enabling Programmatic Use of Decompiled CodeWai Kin Wong, Daoyuan Wu, Huaijin Wang, Zongjie Li et al.ISSTA 2025 · 8 citations
- Impact of Request Formats on Effort Estimation: Are LLMs Different Than Humans?Gül Çalikli, Mohammed AlhamedFSE 2025 · 2 citations
- Code Red! On the Harmfulness of Applying Off-the-Shelf Large Language Models to Programming TasksAli Al-Kaswan, Sebastian Deatc, Begüm Koç, Arie van Deursen et al.FSE 2025 · 1 citation
- Are Humans and LLMs Confused by the Same Code? An Empirical Study on Fixation-Related Potentials and LLM PerplexityYoussef Abdelsalam, Norman Peitek, Anna-Maria Maurer, Mariya Toneva et al.ICSE 2026
- No Evidence for LLMs Being Useful in Problem ReframingJoongi Shin, Anna Polyanskaya, Andrés Lucero, Antti OulasvirtaCHI 2025 · 7 citations
