Autonomous Partner Selection for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Rui Tang, Biao Luo, Yongzheng Cui
Abstract
In cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL), the subgroup-wise learning is employed to assign sub-tasks to agents towards the enhancement of team collaboration. However, the present work is dependent on manually defined allocation criteria, which hinders its capacity to adapt to environmental changes promptly, and also relaxes communication restrictions, thereby constraining the application of algorithms in a range of fields. In order to address these issues, the Autonomous Partner Selection (APS) framework is proposed, which offers an implicit grouping mechanism in an autonomous way. Each agent is capable of autonomously selecting cooperative partners and integrating their own observations with those of partners to harmonise the cooperative behaviour during the training stage. With a view to strictly restricting communication, the intention encoder is trained through information distillation, which enables agents to selectively take more cooperative actions based solely on local observations. Meanwhile, in order to circumvent potential conflicts engendered by homogenization behaviour, we employ a contrastive learning strategy to the cooperative intention generated by agents, thereby ensuring that the behavioural tendencies exhibited by different individuals remain as diverse as possible. Finally, extensive comparative experiments on the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge and Google Research Football are conducted. The results demonstrate that APS exhibits superior performance in comparison to the state-of-the-art algorithms across a range of tasks, and agents can adapt their grouping strategies in accordance with the environment to facilitate enhanced cooperation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext df912aa0-4241-4919-8f6a-d7b0833679f1Builds on18
- Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningTabish Rashid, Gregory Farquhar, Bei Peng, Shimon WhitesonNeurIPS 2020 · 1,960 citations
- QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-LearningJianhao Wang, Zhizhou Ren, Terry Liu, Yang Yu et al.ICLR 2021 · 595 citations
- Google Research Football: A Novel Reinforcement Learning EnvironmentKarol Kurach, Anton Raichuk, Piotr Stanczyk, Michal Zajac et al.AAAI 2020 · 496 citations
- FACMAC: Factored Multi-Agent Centralised Policy GradientsBei Peng, Tabish Rashid, Christian Schröder de Witt, Pierre-Alexandre Kamienny et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 399 citations
- Towards Playing Full MOBA Games with Deep Reinforcement LearningDeheng Ye, Guibin Chen, Wen Zhang, Sheng Chen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 225 citations
Related papers
- LDSA: Learning Dynamic Subtask Assignment in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningMingyu Yang, Jian Zhao, Xunhan Hu, Wengang Zhou et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 61 citations
- Automatic Grouping for Efficient Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningYifan Zang, Jinmin He, Kai Li, Haobo Fu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 37 citations
- Attention-Guided Contrastive Role Representations for Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningZican Hu, Zongzhang Zhang, Huaxiong Li, Chunlin Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 27 citations
- Heterogeneous Skill Learning for Multi-agent TasksYuntao Liu, Yuan Li, Xinhai Xu, Yong Dou et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 33 citations
- ELIGN: Expectation Alignment as a Multi-Agent Intrinsic RewardZixian Ma, Rose E. Wang, Fei-Fei Li, Michael S. Bernstein et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22 citations
