Understanding Interaction with Machine Learning through a Thematic Analysis Coding Assistant: A User Study
Federico Milana, Enrico Costanza, Mirco Musolesi, Amid Ayobi
Abstract
Interactive Machine Learning (ML) enables users, including non-experts in ML, to iteratively train and improve ML models. However, limited research has been reported on how non-experts interact with these systems. Focusing on thematic analysis as a practical application, we report on a user study where 20 participants interacted with TACA, a functioning Interactive ML tool. Thematic analysis involves individual interpretation of ambiguous data, hence it is suited for and can benefit from the iterative customization of models supported by Interactive ML. Through a combination of interaction logs and semi-structured interviews, our findings revealed that, by using TACA, participants critically reflected on their analysis, gained new thematic insights, and adapted their interpretative stance. We also document misconceptions of ML concepts, positivist views, and personal blame for poor model performance. We then discuss how applications could be designed to improve the understanding of Interactive ML concepts and foster reflexive work practices.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Interactive systems and tools; • Computing methodologies → Machine learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext df2a934e-f204-42e8-80a2-6a283e17dbffBuilds on3
- Between Subjectivity and Imposition: Power Dynamics in Data Annotation for Computer VisionMilagros Miceli, Martin Schuessler, Tianling YangCSCW 2020 · 148 citations
- PaTAT: Human-AI Collaborative Qualitative Coding with Explainable Interactive Rule SynthesisSimret Araya Gebreegziabher, Zheng Zhang, Xiaohang Tang, Yihao Meng et al.CHI 2023 · 70 citations
- Designing Alternative Representations of Confusion Matrices to Support Non-Expert Public Understanding of Algorithm PerformanceHong Shen, Haojian Jin, Ángel Alexander Cabrera, Adam Perer et al.CSCW 2020 · 52 citations
Related papers
- Designing Interactive Transfer Learning Tools for ML Non-ExpertsSwati Mishra, Jeffrey M. RzeszotarskiCHI 2021 · 32 citations
- Supporting Co-Adaptive Machine Teaching through Human Concept Learning and Cognitive TheoriesSimret Araya Gebreegziabher, Yukun Yang, Elena L. Glassman, Toby Jia-Jun LiCHI 2025 · 5 citations
- Marcelle: Composing Interactive Machine Learning Workflows and InterfacesJules Françoise, Baptiste Caramiaux, Téo SanchezUIST 2021 · 37 citations
- Whither AutoML? Understanding the Role of Automation in Machine Learning WorkflowsDoris Xin, Eva Yiwei Wu, Doris Jung Lin Lee, Niloufar Salehi et al.CHI 2021 · 103 citations
- AutoML in The Wild: Obstacles, Workarounds, and ExpectationsYuan Sun, Qiurong Song, Xinning Gui, Fenglong Ma et al.CHI 2023 · 28 citations
