InterIDEAS: Philosophical Intertextuality via LLMs
Yue Yang, Yinzhi Xu, Chenghao Huang, JohnMichael Jurgensen, Han Hu, Hao Wang
Abstract
The formation and circulation of ideas in philosophy have profound implications for understanding philosophical dynamism-enabling us to identify seminal texts, delineate intellectual traditions, and track changing conventions in the act of philosophizing. However, traditional analyses of these issues often depend on manual reading and subjective interpretation, constrained by human cognitive limits. We introduce InterIDEAS, a pioneering dataset designed to bridge philosophy, literary studies, and natural language processing (NLP). By merging theories of intertextuality from literary studies with bibliometric techniques and recent LLMs, InterIDEAS facilitates both quantitative and qualitative analysis of the intellectual, social, and historical relations in authentic philosophical texts. This dataset not only assists the study of philosophy but also contributes to the development of language models by providing a training corpus that enhances their interpretative capacity. The code URL for the dataset is https://github.com/ interIDEAS/InterIDEAS_data .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on3
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language RepresentationsZhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel et al.ICLR 2020 · 7,418 citations
Related papers
- The Nature of NLP: Analyzing Contributions in NLP PapersAniket Pramanick, Yufang Hou, Saif M. Mohammad, Iryna GurevychACL 2025 · 9 citations
- How to Engage your Readers? Generating Guiding Questions to Promote Active ReadingPeng Cui, Vilém Zouhar, Xiaoyu Zhang, Mrinmaya SachanACL 2024 · 2 citations
- Scholastic: Graphical Human-AI Collaboration for Inductive and Interpretive Text AnalysisMatt-Heun Hong, Lauren A. Marsh, Jessica L. Feuston, Janet Ruppert et al.UIST 2022 · 26 citations
- Modeling Legal Reasoning: LM Annotation at the Edge of Human AgreementRosamond Elizabeth Thalken, Edward H. Stiglitz, David Mimno, Matthew WilkensEMNLP 2023 · 9 citations
- Sem-Detect: Semantic Level Detection of AI Generated Peer-ReviewsAndré Duarte, Brian Tufts, Aditya Oke, Fei Fang et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
