Scholastic: Graphical Human-AI Collaboration for Inductive and Interpretive Text Analysis
Matt-Heun Hong, Lauren A. Marsh, Jessica L. Feuston, Janet Ruppert, Jed R. Brubaker, Danielle Albers Szafir
Abstract
Interpretive scholars generate knowledge from text corpora by manually sampling documents, applying codes, and refining and collating codes into categories until meaningful themes emerge. Given a large corpus, machine learning could help scale this data sampling and analysis, but prior research shows that experts are generally concerned about algorithms potentially disrupting or driving interpretive scholarship. We take a human-centered design approach to addressing concerns around machine-assisted interpretive research to build Scholastic, which incorporates a machine-in-the-loop clustering algorithm to scaffold interpretive text analysis. As a scholar applies codes to documents and refines them, the resulting coding schema serves as structured metadata which constrains hierarchical document and word clusters inferred from the corpus. Interactive visualizations of these clusters can help scholars strategically sample documents further toward insights. Scholastic demonstrates how human-centered algorithm design and visualizations employing familiar metaphors can support inductive and interpretive research methodologies through interactive topic modeling and document clustering.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers14
- CollabCoder: A Lower-barrier, Rigorous Workflow for Inductive Collaborative Qualitative Analysis with Large Language ModelsJie Gao, Yuchen Guo, Gionnieve Lim, Tianqin Zhang et al.CHI 2024 · 63 citations
- Concept Induction: Analyzing Unstructured Text with High-Level Concepts Using LLooMMichelle S. Lam, Janice Teoh, James A. Landay, Jeffrey Heer et al.CHI 2024 · 46 citations
- Exploring Collaboration Patterns and Strategies in Human-AI Co-creation through the Lens of Agency: A Scoping Review of the Top-tier HCI LiteratureShuning Zhang, Hui Wang, Xin YiCSCW 2025 · 31 citations
- Critical-Reflective Human-AI Collaboration: Exploring Computational Tools for Art Historical Image RetrievalKatrin Glinka, Claudia Müller-BirnCSCW 2023 · 25 citations
- "Don't You Dare Go Hollow": How Dark Souls Helps Players Cope with Depression, a Thematic Analysis of Reddit DiscussionsJaakko Väkevä, Perttu Hämäläinen, Janne LindqvistCHI 2025 · 13 citations
Builds on2
- Putting Tools in Their Place: The Role of Time and Perspective in Human-AI Collaboration for Qualitative AnalysisJessica L. Feuston, Jed R. BrubakerCSCW 2021 · 89 citations
- Supporting Serendipity: Opportunities and Challenges for Human-AI Collaboration in Qualitative AnalysisJialun Aaron Jiang, Kandrea Wade, Casey Fiesler, Jed R. BrubakerCSCW 2021 · 1 citation
Related papers
- HICode: Hierarchical Inductive Coding with LLMsMian Zhong, Pristina Wang, Anjalie FieldEMNLP 2025
- Crystallizing Schemas with Teleoscope: Thematic Curation of Large Text Corpora on RedditPatrick Yung Kang Lee, Paul H. Bucci, Leo Itsuki Foord-Kelcey, Alamjeet Singh et al.CHI 2026
- PaTAT: Human-AI Collaborative Qualitative Coding with Explainable Interactive Rule SynthesisSimret Araya Gebreegziabher, Zheng Zhang, Xiaohang Tang, Yihao Meng et al.CHI 2023 · 70 citations
- Uncovering Intervention Opportunities for Suicide Prevention with Language Model AssistantsJaspreet Ranjit, Hyundong Justin Cho, Claire J. Smerdon, Yoonsoo Nam et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Synergi: A Mixed-Initiative System for Scholarly Synthesis and SensemakingHyeonsu B. Kang, Tongshuang Wu, Joseph Chee Chang, Aniket KitturUIST 2023 · 45 citations
