No Wrong Turns: The Simple Geometry Of Neural Networks Optimization Paths
Charles Guille-Escuret, Hiroki Naganuma, Kilian Fatras, Ioannis Mitliagkas
Abstract
Understanding the optimization dynamics of neural networks is necessary for closing the gap between theory and practice. Stochastic first-order optimization algorithms are known to efficiently locate favorable minima in deep neural networks. This efficiency, however, contrasts with the non-convex and seemingly complex structure of neural loss landscapes. In this study, we delve into the fundamental geometric properties of sampled gradients along optimization paths. We focus on two key quantities, which appear in the restricted secant inequality and error bound. Both hold high significance for first-order optimization. Our analysis reveals that these quantities exhibit predictable, consistent behavior throughout training, despite the stochasticity induced by sampling minibatches. Our findings suggest that not only do optimization trajectories never encounter significant obstacles, but they also maintain stable dynamics during the majority of training. These observed properties are sufficiently expressive to theoretically guarantee linear convergence and prescribe learning rate schedules mirroring empirical practices. We conduct our experiments on image classification, semantic segmentation and language modeling across different batch sizes, network architectures, datasets, optimizers, and initialization seeds. We discuss the impact of each factor. Our work provides novel insights into the properties of neural network loss functions, and opens the door to theoretical frameworks more relevant to prevalent practice. * equal contributions Preprint. Under review.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dd70d2f9-1f0c-4a7e-8cb9-41a5fb7f418eCited by top-tier papers6
- Understanding Adam Requires Better Rotation Dependent AssumptionsTianyue H. Zhang, Lucas Maes, Alan Milligan, Alexia Jolicoeur-Martineau et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- Why Do We Need Warm-up? A Theoretical PerspectiveFoivos Alimisis, Rustem Islamov, Aurelien LucchiICML 2026 · 8 citations
- On the Role of Batch Size in Stochastic Conditional Gradient MethodsRustem Islamov, Roman Machacek, Aurelien Lucchi, Antonio Silveti-Falls et al.ICML 2026 · 6 citations
- Gradient-Weight Alignment as a Train-Time Proxy for Generalization in Classification TasksFlorian A. Hölzl, Daniel Rueckert, Georgios KaissisNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Geometric Inductive Biases of Deep Networks: The Role of Data and ArchitectureSajad Movahedi, Antonio Orvieto, Seyed-Mohsen Moosavi-DezfooliICLR 2025
Builds on4
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Deep learning versus kernel learning: an empirical study of loss landscape geometry and the time evolution of the Neural Tangent KernelStanislav Fort, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Mansheej Paul, Sepideh Kharaghani et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 255 citations
- Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of StabilityJeremy Cohen, Simran Kaur, Yuanzhi Li, J. Zico Kolter et al.ICLR 2021 · 22 citations
- Gradient Descent Is Optimal Under Lower Restricted Secant Inequality And Upper Error BoundCharles Guille-Escuret, Adam Ibrahim, Baptiste Goujaud, Ioannis MitliagkasNeurIPS 2022 · 20 citations
Related papers
- Convex Dominance in Deep Learning I: A Scaling Law of Loss and Learning RateZhiqi Bu, Shiyun Xu, Jialin MaoICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- The Global Convergence Time of Stochastic Gradient Descent in Non-Convex Landscapes: Sharp Estimates via Large DeviationsWaïss Azizian, Franck Iutzeler, Jérôme Malick, Panayotis MertikopoulosICML 2025
- On Monotonic Linear Interpolation of Neural Network ParametersJames Lucas, Juhan Bae, Michael R. Zhang, Stanislav Fort et al.ICML 2021 · 11 citations
- Chaotic Dynamics are Intrinsic to Neural Network Training with SGDLuis Herrmann, Maximilian Granz, Tim LandgrafNeurIPS 2022 · 15 citations
- Neural Mechanics: Symmetry and Broken Conservation Laws in Deep Learning DynamicsDaniel Kunin, Javier Sagastuy-Breña, Surya Ganguli, Daniel L. K. Yamins et al.ICLR 2021 · 100 citations
