Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Graphs
Xi He, Kai Huang, Qingqing Ye, Haibo Hu
Abstract
Graph analysis has become increasingly popular with the prevalence of big data and machine learning. Traditional graph data analysis methods often assume the existence of a trusted third party to collect and store the graph data, which does not align with real-world situations. To address this, some research has proposed utilizing Local Differential Privacy (LDP) to collect graph data or graph metrics (e.g., clustering coefficient). This line of research focuses on collecting two atomic graph metrics (the adjacency bit vectors and node degrees) from each node locally under LDP to synthesize an entire graph or generate graph metrics. However, they have not considered the security issues of LDP for graphs.
In this paper, we bridge the gap by demonstrating that an attacker can inject fake users into LDP protocols for graphs and design data poisoning attacks to degrade the quality of graph metrics. In particular, we present three data poisoning attacks to LDP protocols for graphs. As a proof of concept, we focus on data poisoning attacks on two classical graph metrics: degree centrality and clustering coefficient. We further design two countermeasures for these data poisoning attacks. Experimental study on real-world datasets demonstrates that our attacks can largely degrade the quality of collected graph metrics, and the proposed countermeasures cannot effectively offset the effect, which calls for the development of new defenses.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dd600b1b-f336-4af4-8ffe-56943cdf157dCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on25
- Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression LearningMatthew Jagielski, Alina Oprea, Battista Biggio, Chang Liu et al.S&P 2018 · 867 citations
- Locally Differentially Private Protocols for Frequency EstimationTianhao Wang, Jeremiah Blocki, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaUSENIX Security 2017 · 629 citations
- Heavy Hitter Estimation over Set-Valued Data with Local Differential PrivacyZhan Qin, Yin Yang, Ting Yu, Issa Khalil et al.CCS 2016 · 344 citations
- Generating Synthetic Decentralized Social Graphs with Local Differential PrivacyZhan Qin, Ting Yu, Yin Yang, Issa Khalil et al.CCS 2017 · 266 citations
- Locally Differentially Private Frequent Itemset MiningTianhao Wang, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaS&P 2018 · 196 citations
Related papers
- Devil's Hand: Data Poisoning Attacks to Locally Private Graph Learning ProtocolsLongzhu He, Chaozhuo Li, Peng Tang, Li Sun et al.KDD 2026
- Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy ProtocolsXiaoyu Cao, Jinyuan Jia, Neil Zhenqiang GongUSENIX Security 2021 · 100 citations
- Fine-grained Poisoning Attack to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Mean and Variance EstimationXiaoguang Li, Ninghui Li, Wenhai Sun, Neil Zhenqiang Gong et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Fine-Grained Manipulation Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Range QueryXinyu Li, Wenda Chen, Xuebin RenICDE 2026
- The Devil Within, The Cure Without: Securing Locally Private Graph Learning under PoisoningLongzhu He, Peng Tang, Li Sun, Sen SuWWW 2026
