Devil's Hand: Data Poisoning Attacks to Locally Private Graph Learning Protocols
Longzhu He, Chaozhuo Li, Peng Tang, Li Sun, Sen Su, Philip S. Yu
Abstract
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have achieved significant success in graph representation learning and have been applied to various domains. However, many real-world graphs contain sensitive personal information, such as user profiles in social networks, raising serious privacy concerns when graph learning is performed using GNNs. To address this issue, locally private graph learning protocols have gained considerable attention. These protocols leverage the privacy advantages of local differential privacy (LDP) and the effectiveness of GNN's message-passing in calibrating noisy data, offering strict privacy guarantees for users' local data while maintaining high utility (e.g., node classification accuracy) for graph learning. Despite these advantages, such protocols may be vulnerable to data poisoning attacks, a threat that has not been considered in previous research. Identifying and addressing these threats is crucial for ensuring the robustness and security of privacy-preserving graph learning frameworks. This work introduces the first data poisoning attack targeting locally private graph learning protocols. The attacker injects fake users into the protocol, manipulates these fake users to establish links with genuine users, and sends carefully crafted data to the server, ultimately compromising the utility of private graph learning. The effectiveness of the attack is demonstrated both theoretically and empirically. In addition, several defense strategies have also been explored, but their limited effectiveness highlights the need for more robust defenses.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on18
- Foreshadow: Extracting the Keys to the Intel SGX Kingdom with Transient Out-of-Order ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Marina Minkin, Ofir Weisse, Daniel Genkin et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 1,175 citations
- Town Crier: An Authenticated Data Feed for Smart ContractsFan Zhang, Ethan Cecchetti, Kyle Croman, Ari Juels et al.CCS 2016 · 668 citations
- GNNGuard: Defending Graph Neural Networks against Adversarial AttacksXiang Zhang, Marinka ZitnikNeurIPS 2020 · 416 citations
- Keystone: an open framework for architecting trusted execution environmentsDayeol Lee, David Kohlbrenner, Shweta Shinde, Krste Asanovic et al.EuroSys 2020 · 381 citations
- Plundervolt: Software-based Fault Injection Attacks against Intel SGXKit Murdock, David F. Oswald, Flavio D. Garcia, Jo Van Bulck et al.S&P 2020 · 369 citations
Related papers
- The Devil Within, The Cure Without: Securing Locally Private Graph Learning under PoisoningLongzhu He, Peng Tang, Li Sun, Sen SuWWW 2026
- Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for GraphsXi He, Kai Huang, Qingqing Ye, Haibo HuICDE 2025 · 5 citations
- Locally Private Graph Neural NetworksSina Sajadmanesh, Daniel Gatica-PerezCCS 2021 · 124 citations
- Preserving Node-level Privacy in Graph Neural NetworksZihang Xiang, Tianhao Wang, Di WangS&P 2024 · 28 citations
- Inference Attacks Against Graph Neural NetworksZhikun Zhang, Min Chen, Michael Backes, Yun Shen et al.USENIX Security 2022
