Exploring the Impact of Instruction-Tuning on LLM's Susceptibility to Misinformation
Kyubeen Han, Junseo Jang, Hongjin Kim, Geunyeong Jeong, Harksoo Kim
Abstract
Instruction-tuning enhances the ability of large language models (LLMs) to follow user instructions more accurately, improving usability while reducing harmful outputs. However, this process may increase the model's dependence on user input, potentially leading to the unfiltered acceptance of misinformation and the generation of hallucinations. Existing studies primarily highlight that LLMs are receptive to external information that contradict their parametric knowledge, but little research has been conducted on the direct impact of instructiontuning on this phenomenon. In our study, we investigate the impact of instruction-tuning on LLM's susceptibility to misinformation. Our analysis reveals that instruction-tuned LLMs are significantly more likely to accept misinformation when it is presented by the user. A comparison with base models shows that instruction-tuning increases reliance on userprovided information, shifting susceptibility from the assistant role to the user role. Furthermore, we explore additional factors influencing misinformation susceptibility, such as the role of the user in prompt structure, misinformation length, and the presence of warnings in the system prompt. Our findings underscore the need for systematic approaches to mitigate unintended consequences of instruction-tuning and enhance the reliability of LLMs in realworld applications.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dd01070e-372e-4051-8b9e-a5f6d5c1dc33Builds on9
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
- Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated InstructionsYizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu et al.ACL 2023 · 540 citations
- Adaptive Chameleon or Stubborn Sloth: Revealing the Behavior of Large Language Models in Knowledge ConflictsJian Xie, Kai Zhang, Jiangjie Chen, Renze Lou et al.ICLR 2024 · 294 citations
- Evaluating the Instruction-Following Robustness of Large Language Models to Prompt InjectionZekun Li, Baolin Peng, Pengcheng He, Xifeng YanEMNLP 2024 · 15 citations
Related papers
- Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow InstructionsFederico Bianchi, Mirac Suzgun, Giuseppe Attanasio, Paul Röttger et al.ICLR 2024 · 373 citations
- FLAME : Factuality-Aware Alignment for Large Language ModelsSheng-Chieh Lin, Luyu Gao, Barlas Oguz, Wenhan Xiong et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 63 citations
- Effects of LLM-based Search on Decision Making: Speed, Accuracy, and OverrelianceSofia Eleni Spatharioti, David M. Rothschild, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jake M. HofmanCHI 2025 · 28 citations
- HILL: A Hallucination Identifier for Large Language ModelsFlorian Leiser, Sven Eckhardt, Valentin Leuthe, Merlin Knaeble et al.CHI 2024 · 67 citations
- Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?Zorik Gekhman, Gal Yona, Roee Aharoni, Matan Eyal et al.EMNLP 2024 · 53 citations
