Lune

ACL Findings2024

Chaos with Keywords: Exposing Large Language Models Sycophancy to Misleading Keywords and Evaluating Defense Strategies

Aswin RRV, Nemika Tyagi, Md Nayem Uddin, Neeraj Varshney, Chitta Baral

Abstract

This study explores the sycophantic tendencies of Large Language Models (LLMs), where these models tend to provide answers that match what users want to hear, even if they are not entirely correct. The motivation behind this exploration stems from the common behavior observed in individuals searching the internet for facts with partial or misleading knowledge. Similar to using web search engines, users may recall fragments of misleading keywords and submit them to an LLM, hoping for a comprehensive response. Our empirical analysis of several LLMs shows the potential danger of these models amplifying misinformation when presented with misleading keywords. Additionally, we thoroughly assess four existing hallucination mitigation strategies to reduce LLMs sycophantic behavior. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of these strategies for generating factually correct statements. Furthermore, our analyses delve into knowledgeprobing experiments on factual keywords and different categories of sycophancy mitigation.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 8 top-tier papers that cite it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers8

  1. BrokenMath: A Benchmark for Sycophancy in Theorem Proving with LLMsIvo Petrov, Jasper Dekoninck, Martin VechevICML 2026 · 25 citations
  2. Flattery in Motion: Benchmarking and Analyzing Sycophancy in Video-LLMsWenrui Zhou, Mohamed Hendy, Shu Yang, Qingsong Yang et al.ACL 2026 · 21 citations
  3. How RLHF Amplifies SycophancyItai Shapira, Gerdus Benade, Ariel ProcacciaICML 2026 · 16 citations
  4. Cancer-Myth: Evaluating Large Language Models on Patient Questions with False PresuppositionsWang Zhu, Tianqi Chen, Xinyan Yu, Ching Ying Lin et al.ICLR 2026 · 15 citations
  5. When Identity Skews Debate: Anonymization for Bias-Reduced Multi-Agent ReasoningHyeong Kyu Choi, Xiaojin (Jerry) Zhu, Sharon LiACL 2026 · 12 citations

Builds on17

  1. Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
  2. Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
  3. TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
  4. Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP TasksYizhong Wang, Swaroop Mishra, Pegah Alipoormolabashi, Yeganeh Kordi et al.EMNLP 2022 · 238 citations
  5. When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric MemoriesAlex Mallen, Akari Asai, Victor Zhong, Rajarshi Das et al.ACL 2023 · 233 citations

Related papers

  1. The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language ModelsJunyi Li, Jie Chen, Ruiyang Ren, Xiaoxue Cheng et al.ACL 2024 · 49 citations
  2. Trust Me, I'm Wrong: LLMs Hallucinate with Certainty Despite Knowing the AnswerAdi Simhi, Itay Itzhak, Fazl Barez, Gabriel Stanovsky et al.EMNLP Findings 2025 · 8 citations
  3. On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language ModelsYikang Pan, Liangming Pan, Wenhu Chen, Preslav Nakov et al.EMNLP Findings 2023 · 85 citations
  4. Exploring the Impact of Instruction-Tuning on LLM's Susceptibility to MisinformationKyubeen Han, Junseo Jang, Hongjin Kim, Geunyeong Jeong et al.ACL 2025
  5. How Much Do LLMs Hallucinate across Languages? On Realistic Multilingual Estimation of LLM HallucinationSaad Obaid ul Islam, Anne Lauscher, Goran GlavasEMNLP 2025
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines