Measuring Physical-World Privacy Awareness of Large Language Models: An Evaluation Benchmark
Xinjie Shen, Mufei Li, Pan Li
Abstract
The deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) in embodied agents creates an urgent need to measure their privacy awareness in the physical world. Existing evaluation methods, however, are confined to natural language based scenarios. To bridge this gap, we introduce EAPrivacy, a comprehensive evaluation benchmark designed to quantify the physical-world privacy awareness of LLM-powered agents. EAPrivacy utilizes procedurally generated scenarios across four tiers to test an agent's ability to handle sensitive objects, adapt to changing environments, balance task execution with privacy constraints, and resolve conflicts with social norms. Our measurements reveal a critical deficit in current models. The top-performing model, Gemini 2.5 Pro, achieved only 59% accuracy in scenarios involving changing physical environments. Furthermore, when a task was accompanied by a privacy request, models prioritized completion over the constraint in up to 86% of cases. In high-stakes situations pitting privacy against critical social norms, leading models like GPT-4o and Claude-3.5-haiku disregarded the social norm over 15% of the time. These findings, demonstrated by our benchmark, underscore a fundamental misalignment in LLMs regarding physically grounded privacy and establish the need for more robust, physically-aware alignment. Codes and datasets will be available at https://github.com/Graph-COM/EAPrivacy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dcbb9ef8-70a6-47bb-b1bc-926222dac5d5Builds on16
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language ModelDanny Driess, Fei Xia, Mehdi S. M. Sajjadi, Corey Lynch et al.ICML 2023 · 2,601 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied AgentsWenlong Huang, Pieter Abbeel, Deepak Pathak, Igor MordatchICML 2022 · 1,539 citations
- Habitat 2.0: Training Home Assistants to Rearrange their HabitatAndrew Szot, Alexander Clegg, Eric Undersander, Erik Wijmans et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 826 citations
Related papers
- Mind the Third Eye! Benchmarking Privacy Awareness in MLLM-powered Smartphone AgentsZhixin Lin, Jungang Li, Shidong Pan, Yibo Shi et al.AAAI 2026 · 7 citations
- EmbodiedBench: Comprehensive Benchmarking Multi-modal Large Language Models for Vision-Driven Embodied AgentsRui Yang, Hanyang Chen, Junyu Zhang, Mark Zhao et al.ICML 2025
- IS-Bench: Evaluating Interactive Safety of VLM-Driven Embodied Agents in Daily Household TasksXiaoya Lu, Zeren Chen, Xuhao Hu, Yijin Zhou et al.AAAI 2026 · 20 citations
- MME-RealWorld: Could Your Multimodal LLM Challenge High-Resolution Real-World Scenarios that are Difficult for Humans?Yifan Zhang, Huanyu Zhang, Haochen Tian, Chaoyou Fu et al.ICLR 2025 · 1 citation
- Can't See the Forest for the Trees: Benchmarking Multimodal Safety Awareness for Multimodal LLMsWenxuan Wang, Xiaoyuan Liu, Kuiyi Gao, Jen-tse Huang et al.ACL 2025
