Implicit Bias of Policy Gradient in Linear Quadratic Control: Extrapolation to Unseen Initial States
Noam Razin, Yotam Alexander, Edo Cohen-Karlik, Raja Giryes, Amir Globerson, Nadav Cohen
Abstract
In modern machine learning, models can often fit training data in numerous ways, some of which perform well on unseen (test) data, while others do not. Remarkably, in such cases gradient descent frequently exhibits an implicit bias that leads to excellent performance on unseen data. This implicit bias was extensively studied in supervised learning, but is far less understood in optimal control (reinforcement learning). There, learning a controller applied to a system via gradient descent is known as policy gradient, and a question of prime importance is the extent to which a learned controller extrapolates to unseen initial states. This paper theoretically studies the implicit bias of policy gradient in terms of extrapolation to unseen initial states. Focusing on the fundamental Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) problem, we establish that the extent of extrapolation depends on the degree of exploration induced by the system when commencing from initial states included in training. Experiments corroborate our theory, and demonstrate its conclusions on problems beyond LQR, where systems are non-linear and controllers are neural networks. We hypothesize that real-world optimal control may be greatly improved by developing methods for informed selection of initial states to train on.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext db55b42a-6205-4733-ac91-df7b5c12a789Cited by top-tier papers4
- What Makes a Reward Model a Good Teacher? An Optimization PerspectiveNoam Razin, Zixuan Wang, Hubert Strauss, Stanley Wei et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 73 citations
- Why is Your Language Model a Poor Implicit Reward Model?Noam Razin, Yong Lin, Jiarui Yao, Sanjeev AroraICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Revisiting Glorot Initialization for Long-Range Linear RecurrencesNoga Bar, Mariia Seleznova, Yotam Alexander, Gitta Kutyniok et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Learning Dynamics of RNNs in Closed-Loop EnvironmentsYoav Ger, Omri BarakNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on25
- Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural NetworksKaifeng Lyu, Jian LiICLR 2020 · 402 citations
- How Neural Networks Extrapolate: From Feedforward to Graph Neural NetworksKeyulu Xu, Mozhi Zhang, Jingling Li, Simon Shaolei Du et al.ICLR 2021 · 364 citations
- Accuracy on the Line: on the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution GeneralizationJohn Miller, Rohan Taori, Aditi Raghunathan, Shiori Sagawa et al.ICML 2021 · 323 citations
- The Ingredients of Real World Robotic Reinforcement LearningHenry Zhu, Justin Yu, Abhishek Gupta, Dhruv Shah et al.ICLR 2020 · 202 citations
- What Algorithms can Transformers Learn? A Study in Length GeneralizationHattie Zhou, Arwen Bradley, Etai Littwin, Noam Razin et al.ICLR 2024 · 189 citations
Related papers
- Online Policy Gradient for Model Free Learning of Linear Quadratic Regulators with √T RegretAsaf B. Cassel, Tomer KorenICML 2021 · 20 citations
- Mollification Effects of Policy Gradient MethodsTao Wang, Sylvia L. Herbert, Sicun GaoICML 2024 · 2 citations
- Learning Low Dimensional State Spaces with Overparameterized Recurrent Neural NetsEdo Cohen-Karlik, Itamar Menuhin-Gruman, Raja Giryes, Nadav Cohen et al.ICLR 2023 · 2 citations
- Robust Reinforcement Learning: A Case Study in Linear Quadratic RegulationBo Pang, Zhong-Ping JiangAAAI 2021 · 43 citations
- Stabilizing Dynamical Systems via Policy Gradient MethodsJuan C. Perdomo, Jack Umenberger, Max SimchowitzNeurIPS 2021 · 56 citations
