Estimation and Imputation in Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis with Missing Not At Random Data
Aude Sportisse, Claire Boyer, Julie Josse
Abstract
Missing Not At Random (MNAR) values lead to significant biases in the data, since the probability of missingness depends on the unobserved values.They are ''not ignorable'' in the sense that they often require defining a model for the missing data mechanism, which makes inference or imputation tasks more complex. Furthermore, this implies a strong a priori on the parametric form of the distribution.However, some works have obtained guarantees on the estimation of parameters in the presence of MNAR data, without specifying the distribution of missing data . This is very useful in practice, but is limited to simple cases such as self-masked MNAR values in data generated according to linear regression models.We continue this line of research, but extend it to a more general MNAR mechanism, in a more general model of the probabilistic principal component analysis (PPCA), i.e., a low-rank model with random effects. We prove identifiability of the PPCA parameters. We then propose an estimation of the loading coefficients and a data imputation method. They are based on estimators of means, variances and covariances of missing variables, for which consistency is discussed. These estimators have the great advantage of being calculated using only the observed data, leveraging the underlying low-rank structure of the data. We illustrate the relevance of the method with numerical experiments on synthetic data and also on real data collected from a medical register.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dade5ae5-0fa5-4875-8031-36d35dae86e2Cited by top-tier papers5
- not-MIWAE: Deep Generative Modelling with Missing not at Random DataNiels Bruun Ipsen, Pierre-Alexandre Mattei, Jes FrellsenICLR 2021 · 81 citations
- Identifiable Generative models for Missing Not at Random Data ImputationChao Ma, Cheng ZhangNeurIPS 2021 · 56 citations
- Are labels informative in semi-supervised learning? Estimating and leveraging the missing-data mechanismAude Sportisse, Hugo Schmutz, Olivier Humbert, Charles Bouveyron et al.ICML 2023 · 10 citations
- Symmetric Matrix Completion with ReLU SamplingHuikang Liu, Peng Wang, Longxiu Huang, Qing Qu et al.ICML 2024 · 5 citations
- Regression with Sensor Data Containing Incomplete ObservationsTakayuki Katsuki, Takayuki OsogamiICML 2023 · 1 citation
Builds on1
Related papers
- Matrix Completion with Quantified Uncertainty through Low Rank Gaussian CopulaYuxuan Zhao, Madeleine UdellNeurIPS 2020 · 28 citations
- On the Consistency of Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Probabilistic Principal Component AnalysisArghya Datta, Sayak ChakrabartyNeurIPS 2023 · 8 citations
- NeuMiss networks: differentiable programming for supervised learning with missing valuesMarine Le Morvan, Julie Josse, Thomas Moreau, Erwan Scornet et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 50 citations
- MIRACLE: Causally-Aware Imputation via Learning Missing Data MechanismsTrent Kyono, Yao Zhang, Alexis Bellot, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2021 · 105 citations
- Random features models: a way to study the success of naive imputationAlexis Ayme, Claire Boyer, Aymeric Dieuleveut, Erwan ScornetICML 2024 · 7 citations
