NeuMiss networks: differentiable programming for supervised learning with missing values
Marine Le Morvan, Julie Josse, Thomas Moreau, Erwan Scornet, Gaël Varoquaux
Abstract
The presence of missing values makes supervised learning much more challenging. Indeed, previous work has shown that even when the response is a linear function of the complete data, the optimal predictor is a complex function of the observed entries and the missingness indicator. As a result, the computational or sample complexities of consistent approaches depend on the number of missing patterns, which can be exponential in the number of dimensions. In this work, we derive the analytical form of the optimal predictor under a linearity assumption and various missing data mechanisms including Missing at Random (MAR) and self-masking (Missing Not At Random). Based on a Neumann-series approximation of the optimal predictor, we propose a new principled architecture, named NeuMiss networks. Their originality and strength come from the use of a new type of non-linearity: the multiplication by the missingness indicator. We provide an upper bound on the Bayes risk of NeuMiss networks, and show that they have good predictive accuracy with both a number of parameters and a computational complexity independent of the number of missing data patterns. As a result they scale well to problems with many features, and remain statistically efficient for medium-sized samples. Moreover, we show that, contrary to procedures using EM or imputation, they are robust to the missing data mechanism, including difficult MNAR settings such as self-masking.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3e924f97-9329-45cf-9e68-1a0f1471e1d4Cited by top-tier papers13
- HyperImpute: Generalized Iterative Imputation with Automatic Model SelectionDaniel Jarrett, Bogdan Cebere, Tennison Liu, Alicia Curth et al.ICML 2022 · 129 citations
- What's a good imputation to predict with missing values?Marine Le Morvan, Julie Josse, Erwan Scornet, Gaël VaroquauxNeurIPS 2021 · 95 citations
- Conformal Prediction with Missing ValuesMargaux Zaffran, Aymeric Dieuleveut, Julie Josse, Yaniv RomanoICML 2023 · 31 citations
- Adapting Fairness Interventions to Missing ValuesRaymond Feng, Flávio P. Calmon, Hao WangNeurIPS 2023 · 20 citations
- Dynamic Nonlinear Matrix Completion for Time-Varying Data ImputationJicong FanAAAI 2022 · 11 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Identifiable Generative models for Missing Not at Random Data ImputationChao Ma, Cheng ZhangNeurIPS 2021 · 56 citations
- How to deal with missing data in supervised deep learning?Niels Bruun Ipsen, Pierre-Alexandre Mattei, Jes FrellsenICLR 2022 · 39 citations
- Near-optimal rate of consistency for linear models with missing valuesAlexis Ayme, Claire Boyer, Aymeric Dieuleveut, Erwan ScornetICML 2022 · 10 citations
- Estimation and Imputation in Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis with Missing Not At Random DataAude Sportisse, Claire Boyer, Julie JosseNeurIPS 2020 · 38 citations
- Random features models: a way to study the success of naive imputationAlexis Ayme, Claire Boyer, Aymeric Dieuleveut, Erwan ScornetICML 2024 · 7 citations
