Dynamic Surveys: Using LLMs to Blend Qualitative Depth, Quantitative Structure, and Collaborative Interaction
Kehua Lei, Aidan Ladenburg, Zahra Kais Petiwala, Zili Wang, Dishita Jhawar, Ipsita Bisht, Ansh Kumar, David T. Lee
Abstract
Surveys are a powerful tool for collecting data and eliciting insights on social phenomena, and are critical in product design, marketing, scientific research, and other domains. However, traditional open-ended and closed-ended question formats limit researchers' ability to capture data that combines both the richness of qualitative insights and the analytical rigor of quantitative data. Closed-ended questions facilitate structured data collection that is amenable to statistical analysis but limit respondents' answers. In contrast, open-ended questions allow for nuanced responses incorporating new perspectives but require significant effort to interpret due to their unstructured nature. Moreover, traditional survey tools lack mechanisms to prompt respondents for deeper reflections or to facilitate engagement with others' perspectives, limiting the potential for richer insights. To address these problems, we propose Dynamic Surveys, a survey platform that uses Large Language Models (LLMs) to dynamically cluster qualitative responses in real time and to elicit quantitative ratings and rankings on those clusters and qualitative reflections on how their views compare to broader respondent trends, especially helpful in early-stage or exploratory research settings. This process generates a report showing survey creators and respondents the clustered responses as well as each cluster's rank, rating distribution, and follow-up reflections. To evaluate Dynamic Surveys, we conducted two field studies with 93 participants over a 2-month period. In the first study, 52 students provided input for a career workshop, while in the second, 41 students gave feedback on gaps in their academic curriculum. Of these, 44 respondents filled out a survey on their experience using Dynamic Surveys. We also shared the generated report with 4 individuals who were interested in the insights for their work, and interviewed them to understand their perspectives on the results and any contextual risks they saw in the platform design. Our findings suggest that Dynamic Surveys not only provide richer and deeper insights into responses compared with traditional survey tools, but also increase engagement and foster a sense of community. We discuss broader implications for the design of survey platforms that blend qualitative depth with quantitative structure, facilitating richer insights and offering more collaborative interactions.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Systems and tools for interaction design.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dabfec36-bdcf-4fd0-9bf6-d5469bde7058Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- Putting Tools in Their Place: The Role of Time and Perspective in Human-AI Collaboration for Qualitative AnalysisJessica L. Feuston, Jed R. BrubakerCSCW 2021 · 89 citations
- PaTAT: Human-AI Collaborative Qualitative Coding with Explainable Interactive Rule SynthesisSimret Araya Gebreegziabher, Zheng Zhang, Xiaohang Tang, Yihao Meng et al.CHI 2023 · 70 citations
- Cody: An AI-Based System to Semi-Automate Coding for Qualitative ResearchTim Rietz, Alexander MaedcheCHI 2021 · 67 citations
- CollabCoder: A Lower-barrier, Rigorous Workflow for Inductive Collaborative Qualitative Analysis with Large Language ModelsJie Gao, Yuchen Guo, Gionnieve Lim, Tianqin Zhang et al.CHI 2024 · 63 citations
- Scholastic: Graphical Human-AI Collaboration for Inductive and Interpretive Text AnalysisMatt-Heun Hong, Lauren A. Marsh, Jessica L. Feuston, Janet Ruppert et al.UIST 2022 · 26 citations
Related papers
- LAPS: Automating Hypothesis-Driven Statistical Analysis of Public Survey Using Large Language ModelsJaehoon Kim, Dayoung Jeong, Beejin Son, Hansung Kim et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Chatbots for Data Collection in Surveys: A Comparison of Four Theory-Based Interview ProbesRune Møberg Jacobsen, Samuel Rhys Cox, Carla F. Griggio, Niels van BerkelCHI 2025 · 26 citations
- Collecting Qualitative Data at Scale with Large Language Models: A Case StudyAlejandro Cuevas Villalba, Jennifer V. Scurrell, Eva Maxfield Brown, Jason Entenmann et al.CSCW 2025 · 14 citations
- SurveyGen: Quality-Aware Scientific Survey Generation with Large Language ModelsTong Bao, Mir Tafseer Nayeem, Davood Rafiei, Chengzhi ZhangEMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- Safeguarding Crowdsourcing Surveys from ChatGPT through Prompt InjectionChaofan Wang, Samuel Kernan Freire, Mo Zhang, Jing Wei et al.CSCW 2025 · 1 citation
