Human-LLM Hybrid Text Answer Aggregation for Crowd Annotations
Jiyi Li
Abstract
The quality is a crucial issue for crowd annotations. Answer aggregation is an important type of solution. The aggregated answers estimated from multiple crowd answers to the same instance are the eventually collected annotations, rather than the individual crowd answers themselves. Recently, the capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) on data annotation tasks has attracted interest from researchers. Most of the existing studies mainly focus on the average performance of individual crowd workers; several recent works studied the scenarios of aggregation on categorical labels and LLMs used as label creators. However, the scenario of aggregation on text answers and the role of LLMs as aggregators are not yet well-studied. In this paper, we investigate the capability of LLMs as aggregators in the scenario of close-ended crowd text answer aggregation. We propose a human-LLM hybrid text answer aggregation method with a Creator-Aggregator Multi-Stage (CAMS) crowdsourcing framework. We make the experiments based on public crowdsourcing datasets. The results show the effectiveness of our approach based on the collaboration of crowd workers and LLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5b1eadb4-6872-406e-8f50-6c09a239245fCited by top-tier papers2
- Prompt Candidates, then Distill: A Teacher-Student Framework for LLM-driven Data AnnotationMingxuan Xia, Haobo Wang, Yixuan Li, Zewei Yu et al.ACL 2025 · 4 citations
- Label Aggregation for Composite Crowd Tasks by Worker Ability Constraint SatisfactionJiyi LiAAAI 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on7
- AI Chains: Transparent and Controllable Human-AI Interaction by Chaining Large Language Model PromptsTongshuang Wu, Michael Terry, Carrie Jun CaiCHI 2022 · 465 citations
- If in a Crowdsourced Data Annotation Pipeline, a GPT-4Zeyu He, Chieh-Yang Huang, Chien-Kuang Cornelia Ding, Shaurya Rohatgi et al.CHI 2024 · 31 citations
- ChatGPT to Replace Crowdsourcing of Paraphrases for Intent Classification: Higher Diversity and Comparable Model RobustnessJán Cegin, Jakub Simko, Peter BrusilovskyEMNLP 2023 · 25 citations
- Rank Aggregation via Heterogeneous Thurstone Preference ModelsTao Jin, Pan Xu, Quanquan Gu, Farzad FarnoudAAAI 2020 · 19 citations
- Context-based Collective Preference Aggregation for Prioritizing Crowd Opinions in Social Decision-makingJiyi LiWWW 2022 · 3 citations
Related papers
- Human-LLM Collaborative Annotation Through Effective Verification of LLM LabelsXinru Wang, Hannah Kim, Sajjadur Rahman, Kushan Mitra et al.CHI 2024 · 127 citations
- Next Generation Active Learning: Mixture of LLMs in the LoopYuanyuan Qi, Xiaohao Yang, Jueqing Lu, Guoxiang Guo et al.AAAI 2026
- SkillAggregation: Reference-free LLM-Dependent AggregationGuangzhi Sun, Anmol Kagrecha, Potsawee Manakul, Philip C. Woodland et al.ACL 2025 · 5 citations
- Evaluating LLM-contaminated Crowdsourcing Data Without Ground TruthYichi Zhang, Jinlong Pang, Zhaowei Zhu, Yang LiuNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Wisdom of the Crowd, Without the Crowd: A Socratic LLM for Asynchronous Deliberation on Perspectivist DataMalik Khadar, Daniel Runningen, Julia Tang, Stevie Chancellor et al.CSCW 2025 · 2 citations
