SkillAggregation: Reference-free LLM-Dependent Aggregation
Guangzhi Sun, Anmol Kagrecha, Potsawee Manakul, Philip C. Woodland, Mark J. F. Gales
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to assess NLP tasks due to their ability to generate human-like judgments. Single LLMs were used initially, however, recent work suggests using multiple LLMs as judges yields improved performance. An important step in exploiting multiple judgements is the combination stage, aggregation. Existing methods in NLP either assign equal weight to all LLM judgments or are designed for specific tasks such as hallucination detection. This work focuses on aggregating predictions from multiple systems where no reference labels are available. A new method called SkillAggregation is proposed, which learns to combine estimates from LLM judges without needing additional data or ground truth. It extends the Crowdlayer aggregation method, developed for image classification, to exploit the judge estimates during inference. The approach is compared to a range of standard aggregation methods on HaluEval-Dialogue, TruthfulQA and Chatbot Arena tasks. SkillAggregation outperforms Crowdlayer on all tasks, and yields the best performance over all approaches on the majority of tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0bb26c22-a456-4a6a-8188-122656f2c63dCited by top-tier papers2
- Multi-Agent Debate for LLM Judges with Adaptive Stability DetectionTianyu Hu, Zhen Tan, Song Wang, Huaizhi Qu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 25 citations
- Who can we trust? LLM-as-a-jury for Comparative AssessmentMengjie Qian, Guangzhi Sun, Mark Gales, Kate KnillICML 2026 · 5 citations
Builds on6
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI FeedbackHarrison Lee, Samrat Phatale, Hassan Mansoor, Thomas Mesnard et al.ICML 2024 · 598 citations
- HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language ModelsJunyi Li, Xiaoxue Cheng, Xin Zhao, Jian-Yun Nie et al.EMNLP 2023 · 224 citations
Related papers
- Addressing Pitfalls in the Evaluation of Uncertainty Estimation Methods for Natural Language GenerationMykyta Ielanskyi, Kajetan Schweighofer, Lukas Aichberger, Sepp HochreiterICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- Human-LLM Hybrid Text Answer Aggregation for Crowd AnnotationsJiyi LiEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Are LLMs Better than Reported? Detecting Label Errors and Mitigating Their Effect on Model PerformanceOmer Nahum, Nitay Calderon, Orgad Keller, Idan Szpektor et al.EMNLP 2025 · 9 citations
- SpeechLLM-as-Judges: Towards General and Interpretable Speech Quality EvaluationHui Wang, Jinghua Zhao, Yifan Yang, Shujie Liu et al.ACL 2026 · 21 citations
- Beyond the Surface: Enhancing LLM-as-a-Judge Alignment with Human via Internal RepresentationsPeng Lai, Jianjie Zheng, Sijie Cheng, Yun Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 16 citations
