Beyond the Individual: A Community-Engaged Framework for Ethical Online Community Research
Matthew Zent, Seraphina Yong, Dhruv Bala, Stevie Chancellor, Joseph A. Konstan, Loren Terveen, Svetlana Yarosh
Abstract
Online community research routinely poses minimal risk to individuals, but does the same hold true for online communities? In response to high-profile breaches of online community trust and increased debate in the social computing research community on the ethics of online community research, this paper investigates community-level harms and benefits of research. Through 9 participatory-inspired workshops with four critical online communities (Wikipedia, InTheRooms, CaringBridge, and r/AskHistorians), we found researchers should engage more directly with communities' primary purpose by rationalizing their methods and contributions in the context of community goals to equalize the beneficiaries of community research. To facilitate deeper alignment of these expectations, we present the FACTORS (Functions for Action with Communities: Teaching, Overseeing, Reciprocating, and Sustaining) framework for ethical online community research. Finally, we reflect on our findings by providing implications for researchers and online communities to identify and implement functions for navigating community-level harms and benefits.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dab65d02-2186-4651-9bc4-a3170488abc0Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on6
- Reconsidering Self-Moderation: the Role of Research in Supporting Community-Based Models for Online Content ModerationJoseph SeeringCSCW 2020 · 151 citations
- A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of Community-Collaborative Approaches to Computing ResearchNed Cooper, Tiffanie Horne, Gillian R. Hayes, Courtney Heldreth et al.CHI 2022 · 97 citations
- Why do People Participate in Small Online Communities?Sohyeon Hwang, Jeremy D. FooteCSCW 2021 · 61 citations
- Community Archetypes: An Empirical Framework for Guiding Research Methodologies to Reflect User Experiences of Sense of Virtual Community on RedditGale H. Prinster, C. Estelle Smith, Chenhao Tan, Brian C. KeeganCSCW 2024 · 17 citations
- Peerdea: Co-Designing a Peer Support Platform with Creative EntrepreneursYasmine Kotturi, Jenny Yu, Pranav Khadpe, Erin Gatz et al.CSCW 2024 · 13 citations
Related papers
- Peer Recommendation Interventions for Health-related Social Support: a Feasibility AssessmentZachary Levonian, Matthew Zent, Ngan Nguyen, Matthew McNamara et al.CSCW 2025 · 4 citations
- A Feminist Care Ethics Toolkit for Community-Based Design: Bridging Theory and PracticeAna O. Henriques, Anna R. L. Carter, Beatriz Severes, Reem Talhouk et al.CHI 2025 · 27 citations
- Community-Driven Data Analysis: Advancing Methods to Achieve Community Goals in Collaborative ResearchJessa Dickinson, Natasha Smith-Walker, Burrell Poe, Bradly K. Johnson et al.CSCW 2025 · 4 citations
- Relational, Flexible, Everyday: Learning from Ethics in Dementia ResearchJames Hodge, Sarah Foley, Rens Brankaert, Gail Kenning et al.CHI 2020 · 44 citations
- Roles in the Discussion: An Analysis of Social Support in an Online Forum for People with DementiaJazette Johnson, Rebecca W. Black, Gillian R. HayesCSCW 2020 · 47 citations
