Relational, Flexible, Everyday: Learning from Ethics in Dementia Research
James Hodge, Sarah Foley, Rens Brankaert, Gail Kenning, Amanda Lazar, Jennifer Boger, Kellie Morrissey
Abstract
Engaging in participatory research in HCI raises numerous ethical complexities such as consent, researcher relationships, and participant compensation. Doing HCI work in the area of dementia amplifies these issues, and researchers in this area are modelling ethical stances to ensure researcher-participant relationships focus on meaningful engagement and care. This paper presents an insight into the kinds of ethical foci required when doing design research with people living with dementia and their carers. We interviewed 22 HCI researchers with experience working in dementia care contexts. Our qualitative analysis outlines subsequent lessons-learned, such as recognition of the participants, self -care, research impact, and subjectivity in ethical review boards. Furthermore, we found the complexity of navigating both "everyday" and more formal, institutional ethics in dementia research has implications beyond the context of working with people with dementia and outline key considerations for ethical practices in socially orientated HCI research.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 839ba514-3072-41b7-b1c8-88d1f99104ebCited by top-tier papers6
- Do Datasets Have Politics? Disciplinary Values in Computer Vision Dataset DevelopmentMorgan Klaus Scheuerman, Alex Hanna, Emily DentonCSCW 2021 · 169 citations
- Surfacing the Voices of People with Dementia: Strategies for Effective Inclusion of Proxy Stakeholders in Qualitative ResearchJiamin Dai, Karyn MoffattCHI 2021 · 45 citations
- LivingMoments: Bespoke Social Communication for People living with Dementia and their RelativesMyrte Thoolen, Francesca Toso, Sebastiaan T. M. Peek, Yuan Lu et al.CHI 2022 · 18 citations
- Glanceable Data Visualizations for Older Adults: Establishing Thresholds and Examining Disparities Between Age GroupsZack While, Tanja Blascheck, Yujie Gong, Petra Isenberg et al.CHI 2024 · 14 citations
- Challenging Futures: Using Chatbots to Reflect on Aging and DementiaRucha Khot, Teis Arets, Joel Wester, Franziska Burger et al.CHI 2025 · 13 citations
Related papers
- Student Engagement in Sensitive Design Contexts: A Case Study in Dementia CareSarah Foley, Nadia Pantidi, John C. McCarthyCHI 2020 · 14 citations
- Design Opportunities for Care Transitions in Dementia: Understanding Informal Caregivers' Experiences Through a Practice-Informed ApproachMaarten Houben, Rens Brankaert, Maudy Gosen, Veerle van Overloop et al.CHI 2024 · 17 citations
- Designing with Dynamics: Reflections on Co-design Workshops Between People Living with Dementia and Their Care PartnersLong-Jing Hsu, Alex Foster, Selma Sabanovic, Chia-Fang ChungCHI 2025 · 13 citations
- Approach Matters: Linking Practitioner Approaches to Technology Design for People with DementiaEmma Dixon, Amanda LazarCHI 2020 · 53 citations
- Beyond the Signature: Addressing Informed Consent Challenges in Dementia Technology Research CSCW007Yvon Ruitenburg, Minha Lee, Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn, Panos MarkopoulosCSCW 2026 · 3 citations
