Reinforcement Learning Finetunes Small Subnetworks in Large Language Models
Sagnik Mukherjee, Lifan Yuan, Dilek Hakkani-Tur, Hao Peng
Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) yields substantial improvements in large language models' (LLMs) downstream task performance and alignment with human values. Surprisingly, such large gains result from updating only a small subnetwork comprising just 5%-30% of the parameters, with the rest effectively unchanged. We refer to this phenomenon as parameter update sparsity induced by RL. It is observed across all 7 widely-used RL algorithms (e.g., PPO, GRPO, DPO) and all 10 LLMs from different families in our experiments. This sparsity occurs without any explicit sparsity-promoting regularizations or architectural constraints. Finetuning the subnetwork alone recovers the test accuracy, and, remarkably, produces a model nearly identical to the one obtained via full finetuning. The subnetworks from different random seeds, training data, and even RL algorithms show substantially greater overlap than expected by chance. Our analysis suggests that this sparsity is not due to updating only a subset of layers; instead, nearly all parameter matrices receive similarly sparse updates. Moreover, the updates to almost all parameter matrices are nearly full-rank, suggesting RL updates a small subset of parameters that nevertheless span almost the full subspaces that the parameter matrices can represent. We conjecture that the this update sparsity can be primarily attributed to training on data that is near the policy distribution; techniques that encourage the policy to remain close to the pretrained model, such as the KL regularization and gradient clipping, have limited impact. Our code is available at https://github.com/SagnikMukherjee/sparsity_in_rl.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext da60e1a8-88d0-4ac6-9755-eebc9177b884Cited by top-tier papers20
- RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets LessIdan Shenfeld, Jyothish Pari, Pulkit AgrawalICLR 2026 · 176 citations
- Beyond Binary Rewards: Training LMs to Reason About Their UncertaintyMehul Damani, Isha Puri, Stewart Slocum, Idan Shenfeld et al.ICLR 2026 · 116 citations
- Sparse but Critical: A Token-Level Analysis of Distributional Shifts in RLVR Fine-Tuning of LLMsHaoming Meng, Kexin Huang, Shaohang Wei, Chiyu Ma et al.ICLR 2026 · 24 citations
- On Predictability of Reinforcement Learning Dynamics for Large Language ModelsYuchen Cai, Ding Cao, Xin Xu, Zijun Yao et al.ICLR 2026 · 19 citations
- LaSeR: Reinforcement Learning with Last-Token Self-RewardingWenkai Yang, Weijie Liu, Ruobing Xie, Yiju Guo et al.ICLR 2026 · 12 citations
Builds on27
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free RewardYu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, Danqi ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 1,203 citations
Related papers
- MRPO: Magnitude-Regularized Policy Optimization via L1 ConstraintsWei Han, Yuanxing Liu, Mingda Li, Ruiyu Xiao et al.ICML 2026
- Back to Basics: Revisiting REINFORCE-Style Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMsArash Ahmadian, Chris Cremer, Matthias Gallé, Marzieh Fadaee et al.ACL 2024 · 20 citations
- Rethinking the Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement LearningPenghui Qi, Xiangxin Zhou, Zichen Liu, Tianyu Pang et al.ICML 2026 · 22 citations
- Degeneration-free Policy Optimization: RL Fine-Tuning for Language Models without DegenerationYoungsoo Jang, Geon-Hyeong Kim, Byoungjip Kim, Yu Jin Kim et al.ICML 2024 · 1 citation
- Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive StudyShusheng Xu, Wei Fu, Jiaxuan Gao, Wenjie Ye et al.ICML 2024 · 274 citations
