LaSeR: Reinforcement Learning with Last-Token Self-Rewarding
Wenkai Yang, Weijie Liu, Ruobing Xie, Yiju Guo, Lulu Wu, Saiyong Yang, Yankai Lin
Abstract
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has recently emerged as a core paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). To address the lack of verification signals at test time after RLVR, prior studies incorporate the training of model's self-verification capabilities into the standard RLVR process, thereby unifying reasoning and verification capabilities within a single LLM. However, previous practice requires the LLM to sequentially generate solutions and self-verifications using two separate prompt templates, which doubles the inference cost per sample and significantly reduces efficiency. In this work, we theoretically reveal that the closed-form solution to the RL objective of self-verification training can be approximately reduced to a remarkably simple form: the true reasoning reward of a solution is equal to its last-token self-rewarding score, which is computed as the difference between the policy model's next-token log-probability assigned to any pre-specified token at the solution's last token and a pre-calculated constant, scaled by the KL coefficient. Based on this insight, we propose LaSeR (Reinforcement Learning with Last-Token Self-Rewarding), an algorithm that simply augments the original RLVR loss with a Mean Squared Error (MSE) loss that aligns the last-token self-rewarding scores with the verifier-based reasoning rewards, and jointly optimizes the reasoning and self-rewarding capabilities of LLMs. The optimized self-rewarding scores serve as auxiliary reward signals in both training and testing to enhance model performance. Notably, our algorithm derives these scores from the predicted next-token probability distribution of the last solution token immediately after solution generation, thereby incurring only the minimal extra cost of at most one additional token inference. Experimental results show that our method not only improves the reasoning performance of the model also equips it with remarkable self-rewarding capability, thereby further boosting its inference-time scaling performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c98b45b6-ae37-4ca4-9905-b81eb83fcaf2Cited by top-tier papers6
- Right Question is Already Half the Answer: Fully Unsupervised LLM Reasoning IncentivizationQingyang Zhang, Haitao Wu, Changqing Zhang, Peilin Zhao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 134 citations
- Harder Is Better: Boosting Mathematical Reasoning via Difficulty-Aware GRPO and Multi-Aspect Question ReformulationYanqi Dai, Yuxiang Ji, Xiao Zhang, Yong Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 26 citations
- Do Not Step Into the Same River Twice: Learning to Reason from Trial and ErrorChenming Tang, Hsiu-Yuan Huang, Weijie Liu, Clive Bai et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- CURE: Critique-Driven Unified Reinforcement Learning for Test-Time Self-ImprovementGuirong Chen, Shuqi Ye, Wenkai Yang, Shiqi Shen et al.ACL 2026
- STAR-R1: Multi-View Spatial TrAnsformation Reasoning by Reinforcing Multimodal LLMsZongzhao Li, Zongyang Ma, Mingze Li, Songyou Li et al.CVPR 2026
Builds on22
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2,828 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
- Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base ModelJingcheng Hu, Yinmin Zhang, Qi Han, Daxin Jiang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 533 citations
Related papers
- Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?Zhiqi Chen, Rui Lu, Andrew Zhao, Zhaokai Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1,109 citations
- Trust, But Verify: A Self-Verification Approach to Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable RewardsXiaoyuan Liu, Tian Liang, Zhiwei He, Jiahao Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 46 citations
- Incentivizing LLMs to Self-Verify Their AnswersFuxiang Zhang, Jiacheng Xu, Chaojie Wang, Ce Cui et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
- Random Policy Valuation is Enough for LLM Reasoning with Verifiable RewardsHaoran He, Yuxiao Ye, Qingpeng Cai, Chen Hu et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Self-Aligned Reward: Towards Effective and Efficient ReasonersPeixuan Han, ADIT KRISHNAN, Gerald Friedland, Jiaxuan You et al.ICLR 2026 · 10 citations
