Error Norm Truncation: Robust Training in the Presence of Data Noise for Text Generation Models
Tianjian Li, Haoran Xu, Philipp Koehn, Daniel Khashabi, Kenton Murray
Abstract
Text generation models are notoriously vulnerable to errors in the training data. With the wide-spread availability of massive amounts of web-crawled data becoming more commonplace, how can we enhance the robustness of models trained on a massive amount of noisy web-crawled text? In our work, we propose Error Norm Truncation (ENT), a robust enhancement to the standard training objective that truncates noisy data. Compared to methods that only use the negative loglikelihood loss over target words to estimate data quality, our method provides a more accurate estimation by considering the distribution of non-target tokens, which is often overlooked by previous work. Through comprehensive experiments across language modeling, machine translation, and text summarization, we show that equipping text generation models with ENT improves generation quality over standard training and previous soft and hard truncation methods. Furthermore, we show that our method improves the robustness of models against two of the most detrimental types of noise in machine translation, resulting in an increase of more than 2 BLEU points over the MLE baseline when up to 50% of noise is added to the data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d9c4cb36-feaa-42fa-9c01-9a6766439439Cited by top-tier papers3
- Not All Tokens Are What You Need for PretrainingZhenghao Lin, Zhibin Gou, Yeyun Gong, Xiao Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 99 citations
- SelecTKD: Selective Token-Weighted Knowledge Distillation for LLMsHaiduo Huang, Jiangcheng Song, Yadong Zhang, Pengju RenCVPR 2026 · 18 citations
- SCAN: Bootstrapping Contrastive Pre-training for Data EfficiencyYangyang Guo, Mohan KankanhalliICCV 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on34
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task LearningTianhe Yu, Saurabh Kumar, Abhishek Gupta, Sergey Levine et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 2,261 citations
- BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and ComprehensionMike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad et al.ACL 2020 · 1,224 citations
- Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in TrainingMansheej Paul, Surya Ganguli, Gintare Karolina DziugaiteNeurIPS 2021 · 806 citations
- Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient DescentGarima Pruthi, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, Mukund SundararajanNeurIPS 2020 · 784 citations
Related papers
- Improved Natural Language Generation via Loss TruncationDaniel Kang, Tatsunori HashimotoACL 2020 · 72 citations
- On the Blind Spots of Model-Based Evaluation Metrics for Text GenerationTianxing He, Jingyu Zhang, Tianle Wang, Sachin Kumar et al.ACL 2023 · 10 citations
- Contrastive Error Attribution for Finetuned Language ModelsFaisal Ladhak, Esin Durmus, Tatsunori HashimotoACL 2023
- Addressing Posterior Collapse with Mutual Information for Improved Variational Neural Machine TranslationArya D. McCarthy, Xian Li, Jiatao Gu, Ning DongACL 2020 · 19 citations
- Did Translation Models Get More Robust Without Anyone Even Noticing?Ben Peters, André F. T. MartinsACL 2025 · 10 citations
