Quantization Meets OOD: Generalizable Quantization-aware Training from a Flatness Perspective
Jiacheng Jiang, Yuan Meng, Chen Tang, Han Yu, Qun Li, Zhi Wang, Wenwu Zhu
Abstract
Current quantization-aware training (QAT) methods primarily focus on enhancing the performance of quantized models on in-distribution (I.D) data, while overlooking the potential performance degradation on out-of-distribution (OOD) data. In this paper, we first substantiate this problem through rigorous experiment, showing that QAT can lead to a significant OOD generalization performance degradation. Further, we find the contradiction between the perspective that flatness of loss landscape gives rise to superior OOD generalization and the phenomenon that QAT lead to a sharp loss landscape, can cause the above problem. Therefore, we propose a flatness-oriented QAT method, FQAT, to achieve generalizable QAT. Specifically, i) FQAT introduces a layer-wise freezing mechanism to mitigate the gradient conflict issue between dual optimization objectives (i.e., vanilla QAT and flatness). ii) FQAT proposes an disorder-guided adaptive freezing algorithm to dynamically determines which layers to freeze at each training step, effectively addressing the challenges caused by interference between layers. A gradient disorder metric is designed to help the algorithm identify unstable layers during training. Extensive experiments on influential OOD benchmark demonstrate the superiority of our method over state-of-the-art baselines under both I.D and OOD image classification tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on24
- Sharpness-aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving GeneralizationPierre Foret, Ariel Kleiner, Hossein Mobahi, Behnam NeyshaburICLR 2021 · 1,861 citations
- WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution ShiftsPang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie et al.ICML 2021 · 1,773 citations
- In Search of Lost Domain GeneralizationIshaan Gulrajani, David Lopez-PazICLR 2021 · 1,416 citations
- Learned Step Size quantizationSteven K. Esser, Jeffrey L. McKinstry, Deepika Bablani, Rathinakumar Appuswamy et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,037 citations
- Domain Generalization with MixStyleKaiyang Zhou, Yongxin Yang, Yu Qiao, Tao XiangICLR 2021 · 986 citations
Related papers
- Allowing Oscillation Quantization: Overcoming Solution Space Limitation in Low Bit-Width QuantizationWeiying Xie, Zihan Meng, Jitao Ma, Wenjin Guo et al.ICCV 2025 · 1 citation
- Compute-Optimal Quantization-Aware TrainingAleksandr Dremov, David Grangier, Angelos Katharopoulos, Awni HannunICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- WinQ: Accelerating Quantization-Aware Training of Language Models Around Saddle PointsDongyue Li, Zechun Liu, Kai Yi, Zhenshuo Zhang et al.ICML 2026
- QT-DoG: Quantization-Aware Training for Domain GeneralizationSaqib Javed, Hieu Le, Mathieu SalzmannICML 2025
- Overcoming Oscillations in Quantization-Aware TrainingMarkus Nagel, Marios Fournarakis, Yelysei Bondarenko, Tijmen BlankevoortICML 2022 · 163 citations
