In Search of Lost Domain Generalization
Ishaan Gulrajani, David Lopez-Paz
Abstract
The goal of domain generalization algorithms is to predict well on distributions different from those seen during training. While a myriad of domain generalization algorithms exist, inconsistencies in experimental conditions-datasets, architectures, and model selection criteria-render fair and realistic comparisons difficult. In this paper, we are interested in understanding how useful domain generalization algorithms are in realistic settings. As a first step, we realize that model selection is non-trivial for domain generalization tasks. Contrary to prior work, we argue that domain generalization algorithms without a model selection strategy should be regarded as incomplete. Next, we implement DOMAINBED, a testbed for domain generalization including seven multi-domain datasets, nine baseline algorithms, and three model selection criteria. We conduct extensive experiments using DO-MAINBED and find that, when carefully implemented, empirical risk minimization shows state-of-the-art performance across all datasets. Looking forward, we hope that the release of DOMAINBED, along with contributions from fellow researchers, will streamline reproducible and rigorous research in domain generalization. * Alphabetical order, equal contribution. Preprint. Under review.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f6d9f446-1db3-4bb6-b6d8-1cf156af02daCited by top-tier papers306
- Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)David Krueger, Ethan Caballero, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, Amy Zhang et al.ICML 2021 · 1,163 citations
- Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image ClassificationRohan Taori, Achal Dave, Vaishaal Shankar, Nicholas Carlini et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 731 citations
- SWAD: Domain Generalization by Seeking Flat MinimaJunbum Cha, Sanghyuk Chun, Kyungjae Lee, Han-Cheol Cho et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 630 citations
- MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and AugmentationMarvin Zhang, Sergey Levine, Chelsea FinnNeurIPS 2022 · 595 citations
- Test-Time Classifier Adjustment Module for Model-Agnostic Domain GeneralizationYusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka MatsuoNeurIPS 2021 · 456 citations
Builds on4
- Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain AdaptationXingchao Peng, Qinxun Bai, Xide Xia, Zijun Huang et al.ICCV 2019 · 2,239 citations
- Deep Domain-Adversarial Image Generation for Domain GeneralisationKaiyang Zhou, Yongxin Yang, Timothy M. Hospedales, Tao XiangAAAI 2020 · 488 citations
- Episodic Training for Domain GeneralizationDa Li, Jianshu Zhang, Yongxin Yang, Cong Liu et al.ICCV 2019 · 488 citations
- Domain Generalization Using a Mixture of Multiple Latent DomainsToshihiko Matsuura, Tatsuya HaradaAAAI 2020 · 355 citations
Related papers
- Lost Domain Generalization Is a Natural Consequence of Lack of Training DomainsYimu Wang, Yihan Wu, Hongyang ZhangAAAI 2024 · 7 citations
- DART: Diversify-Aggregate-Repeat Training Improves Generalization of Neural NetworksSamyak Jain, Sravanti Addepalli, Pawan Kumar Sahu, Priyam Dey et al.CVPR 2023
- SIMPLE: Specialized Model-Sample Matching for Domain GeneralizationZiyue Li, Kan Ren, Xinyang Jiang, Yifei Shen et al.ICLR 2023
- Sparse Mixture-of-Experts are Domain Generalizable LearnersBo Li, Yifei Shen, Jingkang Yang, Yezhen Wang et al.ICLR 2023 · 11 citations
- Probable Domain Generalization via Quantile Risk MinimizationCian Eastwood, Alexander Robey, Shashank Singh, Julius von Kügelgen et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 99 citations
