Studying the Interplay Between the Actor and Critic Representations in Reinforcement Learning
Samuel Garcin, Trevor McInroe, Pablo Samuel Castro, Christopher G. Lucas, David Abel, Prakash Panangaden, Stefano V. Albrecht
Abstract
Extracting relevant information from a stream of high-dimensional observations is a central challenge for deep reinforcement learning agents. Actor-critic algorithms add further complexity to this challenge, as it is often unclear whether the same information will be relevant to both the actor and the critic. To this end, we here explore the principles that underlie effective representations for the actor and for the critic in on-policy algorithms. We focus our study on understanding whether the actor and critic will benefit from separate, rather than shared, representations. Our primary finding is that when separated, the representations for the actor and critic systematically specialise in extracting different types of information from the environment-the actor's representation tends to focus on action-relevant information, while the critic's representation specialises in encoding value and dynamics information. We conduct a rigourous empirical study to understand how different representation learning approaches affect the actor and critic's specialisations and their downstream performance, in terms of sample efficiency and generation capabilities. Finally, we discover that a separated critic plays an important role in exploration and data collection during training. Our code, trained models and data are accessible at https://github.com/francelico/deac-rep .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d97dc32b-bdba-4e65-a6e1-0c8e4cdf9e8fCited by top-tier papers4
- Simplicial Embeddings Improve Sample Efficiency in Actor–Critic AgentsJohan Obando-Ceron, Walter Mayor, Samuel Lavoie, Scott Fujimoto et al.ICLR 2026 · 12 citations
- Enhancing Tactile-based Reinforcement Learning for Robotic ControlElle Miller, Trevor McInroe, David Abel, Oisin Mac Aodha et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Stackelberg Coupling of Online Representation Learning and Reinforcement LearningFernando Martinez, Tao Li, Yingdong Lu, Juntao ChenICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Action-Sufficient Goal RepresentationsJinu Hyeon, Woobin Park, Hongjoon Ahn, Taesup MoonICML 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on22
- CURL: Contrastive Unsupervised Representations for Reinforcement LearningMichael Laskin, Aravind Srinivas, Pieter AbbeelICML 2020 · 1,261 citations
- Image Augmentation Is All You Need: Regularizing Deep Reinforcement Learning from PixelsDenis Yarats, Ilya Kostrikov, Rob FergusICLR 2021 · 911 citations
- Reinforcement Learning with Augmented DataMichael Laskin, Kimin Lee, Adam Stooke, Lerrel Pinto et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 833 citations
- Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement LearningKarl Cobbe, Christopher Hesse, Jacob Hilton, John SchulmanICML 2020 · 685 citations
- Improving Sample Efficiency in Model-Free Reinforcement Learning from ImagesDenis Yarats, Amy Zhang, Ilya Kostrikov, Brandon Amos et al.AAAI 2021 · 506 citations
Related papers
- Decoupling Value and Policy for Generalization in Reinforcement LearningRoberta Raileanu, Rob FergusICML 2021 · 116 citations
- Adversarially Guided Actor-CriticYannis Flet-Berliac, Johan Ferret, Olivier Pietquin, Philippe Preux et al.ICLR 2021 · 78 citations
- Phasic Policy GradientKarl Cobbe, Jacob Hilton, Oleg Klimov, John SchulmanICML 2021 · 191 citations
- Can Increasing Input Dimensionality Improve Deep Reinforcement Learning?Kei Ota, Tomoaki Oiki, Devesh K. Jha, Toshisada Mariyama et al.ICML 2020 · 61 citations
- Stochastic Latent Actor-Critic: Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Latent Variable ModelAlex X. Lee, Anusha Nagabandi, Pieter Abbeel, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 437 citations
