Adversarially Guided Actor-Critic
Yannis Flet-Berliac, Johan Ferret, Olivier Pietquin, Philippe Preux, Matthieu Geist
Abstract
Despite definite success in deep reinforcement learning problems, actor-critic algorithms are still confronted with sample inefficiency in complex environments, particularly in tasks where efficient exploration is a bottleneck. These methods consider a policy (the actor) and a value function (the critic) whose respective losses are built using different motivations and approaches. This paper introduces a third protagonist: the adversary. While the adversary mimics the actor by minimizing the KL-divergence between their respective action distributions, the actor, in addition to learning to solve the task, tries to differentiate itself from the adversary predictions. This novel objective stimulates the actor to follow strategies that could not have been correctly predicted from previous trajectories, making its behavior innovative in tasks where the reward is extremely rare. Our experimental analysis shows that the resulting Adversarially Guided Actor-Critic (AGAC) algorithm leads to more exhaustive exploration. Notably, AGAC outperforms current state-of-the-art methods on a set of various hard-exploration and procedurally-generated tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers21
- Exploration via Elliptical Episodic BonusesMikael Henaff, Roberta Raileanu, Minqi Jiang, Tim RocktäschelNeurIPS 2022 · 72 citations
- MADE: Exploration via Maximizing Deviation from Explored RegionsTianjun Zhang, Paria Rashidinejad, Jiantao Jiao, Yuandong Tian et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 51 citations
- A Study of Global and Episodic Bonuses for Exploration in Contextual MDPsMikael Henaff, Minqi Jiang, Roberta RaileanuICML 2023 · 18 citations
- Learning General World Models in a Handful of Reward-Free DeploymentsYingchen Xu, Jack Parker-Holder, Aldo Pacchiano, Philip J. Ball et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 16 citations
- Learning Value Functions in Deep Policy Gradients using Residual VarianceYannis Flet-Berliac, Reda Ouhamma, Odalric-Ambrym Maillard, Philippe PreuxICLR 2021 · 16 citations
Builds on7
- Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement LearningKarl Cobbe, Christopher Hesse, Jacob Hilton, John SchulmanICML 2020 · 685 citations
- RIDE: Rewarding Impact-Driven Exploration for Procedurally-Generated EnvironmentsRoberta Raileanu, Tim RocktäschelICLR 2020 · 198 citations
- Network Randomization: A Simple Technique for Generalization in Deep Reinforcement LearningKimin Lee, Kibok Lee, Jinwoo Shin, Honglak LeeICLR 2020 · 191 citations
- Observational Overfitting in Reinforcement LearningXingyou Song, Yiding Jiang, Stephen Tu, Yilun Du et al.ICLR 2020 · 148 citations
- Munchausen Reinforcement LearningNino Vieillard, Olivier Pietquin, Matthieu GeistNeurIPS 2020 · 120 citations
Related papers
- Shared Experience Actor-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningFilippos Christianos, Lukas Schäfer, Stefano V. AlbrechtNeurIPS 2020 · 238 citations
- Decoupling Value and Policy for Generalization in Reinforcement LearningRoberta Raileanu, Rob FergusICML 2021 · 116 citations
- Adaptive Procedural Task Generation for Hard-Exploration ProblemsKuan Fang, Yuke Zhu, Silvio Savarese, Li Fei-FeiICLR 2021 · 36 citations
- Studying the Interplay Between the Actor and Critic Representations in Reinforcement LearningSamuel Garcin, Trevor McInroe, Pablo Samuel Castro, Christopher G. Lucas et al.ICLR 2025
- Quality-Diversity Actor-Critic: Learning High-Performing and Diverse Behaviors via Value and Successor Features CriticsLuca Grillotti, Maxence Faldor, Borja G. León, Antoine CullyICML 2024 · 13 citations
