Lune

ACL Findings2025

Reverse Preference Optimization for Complex Instruction Following

Xiang Huang, Ting-En Lin, Feiteng Fang, Yuchuan Wu, Hangyu Li, Yuzhong Qu, Fei Huang, Yongbin Li

Abstract

Instruction following (IF) is a critical capability for large language models (LLMs). However, handling complex instructions with multiple constraints remains challenging. Previous methods typically select preference pairs based on the number of constraints they satisfy, introducing noise where chosen examples may fail to follow some constraints and rejected examples may excel in certain respects over the chosen ones. To address the challenge of aligning with multiple preferences, we propose a simple yet effective method called Reverse Preference Optimization (RPO). It mitigates noise in preference pairs by dynamically reversing the constraints within the instruction to ensure the chosen response is perfect, alleviating the burden of extensive sampling and filtering to collect perfect responses. Besides, reversal also enlarges the gap between chosen and rejected responses, thereby clarifying the optimization direction and making it more robust to noise. We evaluate RPO on two multi-turn IF benchmarks, Sysbench and Multi-IF, demonstrating average improvements over the DPO baseline of 4.6 and 2.5 points (on Llama-3.1 8B), respectively. Moreover, RPO scales effectively across model sizes (8B to 70B parameters), with the 70B RPO model surpassing GPT-4o.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 3 top-tier papers that cite it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers3

  1. Replay Failures as Successes: Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Instruction FollowingKongcheng Zhang, QI YAO, Shunyu Liu, Wenjian Zhang et al.ICML 2026 · 4 citations
  2. IF-CRITIC: Towards a Fine-Grained LLM Critic for Instruction-Following EvaluationBosi Wen, Yilin Niu, Cunxiang Wang, Pei Ke et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
  3. ImpRIF: Stronger Implicit Reasoning Leads to Better Complex Instruction FollowingYuancheng Yang, Lin Yang, Xu Wang, Chao Tong et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation

Builds on14

  1. Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
  2. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
  3. LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
  4. Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
  5. WizardLM: Empowering Large Pre-Trained Language Models to Follow Complex InstructionsCan Xu, Qingfeng Sun, Kai Zheng, Xiubo Geng et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,206 citations

Related papers

  1. IOPO: Empowering LLMs with Complex Instruction Following via Input-Output Preference OptimizationXinghua Zhang, Haiyang Yu, Cheng Fu, Fei Huang et al.ACL 2025 · 29 citations
  2. MM-IFEngine: Towards Multimodal Instruction FollowingShengyuan Ding, Shenxi Wu, Xiangyu Zhao, Yuhang Zang et al.ICCV 2025 · 3 citations
  3. Parrot: Enhancing Multi-Turn Instruction Following for Large Language ModelsYuchong Sun, Che Liu, Kun Zhou, Jinwen Huang et al.ACL 2024
  4. Beyond Pairwise: Empowering LLM Alignment With (Ranked) Choice ModelingYuxuan Tang, Yifan FengICLR 2026 · 1 citation
  5. UltraIF: Advancing Instruction Following from the WildKaikai An, Li Sheng, Ganqu Cui, Shuzheng Si et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines