ImpRIF: Stronger Implicit Reasoning Leads to Better Complex Instruction Following
Yuancheng Yang, Lin Yang, Xu Wang, Chao Tong, Haihua Yang
Abstract
As applications of large language models (LLMs) become increasingly complex, the demand for robust complex instruction following capabilities is growing accordingly. We argue that a thorough understanding of the instruction itself, especially the latent reasoning structure embedded between the lines, is crucial for improving instruction following. Therefore we target complex instructions that involve implicit reasoning, intricate logical relations, and multiconstraint dependencies. We propose ImpRIF, a method to enhance LLMs' understanding of implicit reasoning instructions, thereby improving its ability to follow complex instructions. We formalize such instructions as verifiable reasoning graphs, enabling programmatic verification and graph-driven chain-of-thought reasoning. Based on this formulation, we synthesize large-scale single-and multi-turn data, propose fine-tuning with graph reasoning, and apply reinforcement learning to explicitly train models to reason along the graph. On five complex instruction following benchmarks, our models substantially outperform their base models. These results demonstrate that enhancing implicit reasoning capabilities can significantly improve complex instruction following. * Equal Contributions † Corresponding Authors Complex Instruction Complex Implicit Reasoning Instruction Multi-hop Reasoning Constraints ... Use subheadings (level 2 headings) ... ; Use at least 2 analogies; Avoid absolute wording (such as "certainly ..."), and if used, add qualifying conditions; ... shall not appear in the full text.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7aaabadc-7e6f-4e79-8e06-29b08687d694Builds on14
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Can Large Language Models Understand Real-World Complex Instructions?Qianyu He, Jie Zeng, Wenhao Huang, Lina Chen et al.AAAI 2024 · 99 citations
- When Thinking Fails: The Pitfalls of Reasoning for Instruction-Following in LLMsXiaomin Li, Zhou Yu, Zhiwei Zhang, Xupeng Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 63 citations
- HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF FrameworkGuangming Sheng, Chi Zhang, Zilingfeng Ye, Xibin Wu et al.EuroSys 2025 · 61 citations
- CFBench: A Comprehensive Constraints-Following Benchmark for LLMsTao Zhang, Chenglin Zhu, Yanjun Shen, Wenjing Luo et al.ACL 2025 · 53 citations
Related papers
- VerIF: Verification Engineering for Reinforcement Learning in Instruction FollowingHao Peng, Yunjia Qi, Xiaozhi Wang, Bin Xu et al.EMNLP 2025 · 24 citations
- CGMIS: Concept-Graph Based Multi-Hop Instructions Synthesis for Enhancing Long-Context ReasoningZechen Sun, Zecheng Tang, Juntao Li, Wenpeng Hu et al.AAAI 2026
- Incentivizing Reasoning for Advanced Instruction-Following of Large Language ModelsYulei Qin, Gang Li, Zongyi Li, Zihan Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- GraphIF: Enhancing Multi-Turn Instruction Following for Large Language Models with Relation Graph PromptZhenhe Li, Can Lin, Ling Zheng, Wen-Da Wei et al.AAAI 2026
- Scaling Reasoning, Losing Control: Evaluating Instruction Following in Large Reasoning ModelsTingchen Fu, Yafu Li, Jiawei Gu, Xiaoye Qu et al.ACL 2026 · 25 citations
