Incentivizing Reasoning for Advanced Instruction-Following of Large Language Models
Yulei Qin, Gang Li, Zongyi Li, Zihan Xu, Yuchen Shi, Zhekai Lin, Xiao Cui, Ke Li, Xing Sun
Abstract
Existing large language models (LLMs) face challenges of following complex instructions, especially when multiple constraints are present and organized in paralleling, chaining, and branching structures. One intuitive solution, namely chain-of-thought (CoT), is expected to universally improve capabilities of LLMs. However, we find that the vanilla CoT exerts a negative impact on performance due to its superficial reasoning pattern of simply paraphrasing the instructions. It fails to peel back the compositions of constraints for identifying their relationship across hierarchies of types and dimensions. To this end, we propose RAIF, a systematic method to boost LLMs in dealing with complex instructions via incentivizing reasoning for test-time compute scaling. First, we stem from the decomposition of complex instructions under existing taxonomies and propose a reproducible data acquisition method. Second, we exploit reinforcement learning (RL) with verifiable rule-centric reward signals to cultivate reasoning specifically for instruction following. We address the shallow, non-essential nature of reasoning under complex instructions via sample-wise contrast for superior CoT enforcement. We also exploit behavior cloning of experts to facilitate steady distribution shift from fast-thinking LLMs to skillful reasoners. Extensive evaluations on seven comprehensive benchmarks confirm the validity of the proposed method, where a 1.5B LLM achieves 11.74% gains with performance comparable to a 8B LLM. Evaluation on OOD constraints also confirms the generalizability of our RAIF. Codes and data are available at https://github.com/yuleiqin/RAIF. Keywords: reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), instruction following, complex instructions
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 05405adb-b565-40e4-90a9-d90106a69de8Cited by top-tier papers9
- Learn the Ropes, Then Trust the Wins: Self-imitation with Progressive Exploration for Agentic Reinforcement LearningYulei Qin, Xiaoyu Tan, Zhengbao He, Gang Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- RAIN-Merging: A Gradient-Free Method to Enhance Instruction Following in Large Reasoning Models with Preserved Thinking FormatZhehao Huang, Yuhang Liu, Baijiong Lin, Yixin Lou et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Instructions are all you need: Self-supervised Reinforcement Learning for Instruction FollowingQingyu Ren, Qianyu He, Powei Chang, Jie Zeng et al.ACL 2026 · 6 citations
- Replay Failures as Successes: Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Instruction FollowingKongcheng Zhang, QI YAO, Shunyu Liu, Wenjian Zhang et al.ICML 2026 · 4 citations
- ImpRIF: Stronger Implicit Reasoning Leads to Better Complex Instruction FollowingYuancheng Yang, Lin Yang, Xu Wang, Chao Tong et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on36
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
Related papers
- Provable Benefits of RLVR over SFT for Reasoning Models: Learning to Backtrack EfficientlyStanley Wei, Juno KimICML 2026
- VerIF: Verification Engineering for Reinforcement Learning in Instruction FollowingHao Peng, Yunjia Qi, Xiaozhi Wang, Bin Xu et al.EMNLP 2025 · 24 citations
- Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought ReasoningShiming Yang, Yuxuan Tong, Xinyao Niu, Graham Neubig et al.ICML 2025
- Rectifying LLM Thought from Lens of OptimizationJunnan Liu, Hongwei Liu, Songyang Zhang, Kai ChenICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- When Thinking Fails: The Pitfalls of Reasoning for Instruction-Following in LLMsXiaomin Li, Zhou Yu, Zhiwei Zhang, Xupeng Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 63 citations
