AdvPrefix: An Objective for Nuanced LLM Jailbreaks
Sicheng Zhu, Brandon Amos, Yuandong Tian, Chuan Guo, Ivan Evtimov
Abstract
Many jailbreak attacks on large language models (LLMs) rely on a common objective: making the model respond with the prefix "Sure, here is (harmful request)". While straightforward, this objective has two limitations: limited control over model behaviors, yielding incomplete or unrealistic jailbroken responses, and a rigid format that hinders optimization. We introduce AdvPrefix, a plug-andplay prefix-forcing objective that selects one or more model-dependent prefixes by combining two criteria: high prefilling attack success rates and low negative log-likelihood. AdvPrefix integrates seamlessly into existing jailbreak attacks to mitigate the previous limitations for free. For example, replacing GCG's default prefixes on Llama-3 improves nuanced attack success rates from 14% to 80%, revealing that current safety alignment fails to generalize to new prefixes. Code and selected prefixes are released in github.com/facebookresearch/jailbreak-objectives. Warning: This paper includes language that could be considered inappropriate or harmful.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d931b53d-83e0-4d96-acdb-918508fd7e61Cited by top-tier papers6
- MetaDefense: Defending Fine-tuning based Jailbreak Attack Before and During GenerationWeisen Jiang, Sinno Jialin PanNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- Token Buncher: Shielding LLMs from Harmful Reinforcement Learning Fine-TuningWeitao Feng, Lixu Wang, Peizhuo Lv, Tianyi Wei et al.CCS 2026 · 9 citations
- Where to Start Alignment? Diffusion Large Language Model May Demand a Distinct PositionZhixin Xie, Xurui Song, Jun LuoAAAI 2026 · 7 citations
- Guiding not Forcing: Enhancing the Transferability of Jailbreaking Attacks on LLMs via Removing Superfluous ConstraintsJunxiao Yang, Zhexin Zhang, Shiyao Cui, Hongning Wang et al.ACL 2025 · 6 citations
- REINFORCE Adversarial Attacks on Large Language Models: An Adaptive, Distributional, and Semantic ObjectiveSimon Geisler, Tom Wollschläger, M. H. I. Abdalla, Vincent Cohen-Addad et al.ICML 2025
Builds on30
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?Alexander Wei, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob SteinhardtNeurIPS 2023 · 2,230 citations
- HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust RefusalMantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou et al.ICML 2024 · 1,031 citations
Related papers
- Efficient LLM-Jailbreaking via Multimodal-LLM JailbreakHaoxuan Ji, Zheng Lin, Zhenxing Niu, Xinbo Gao et al.AAAI 2026 · 4 citations
- Attention Eclipse: Manipulating Attention to Bypass LLM Safety-AlignmentPedram Zaree, Md Abdullah Al Mamun, Quazi Mishkatul Alam, Yue Dong et al.EMNLP 2025
- TAO-Attack: Toward Advanced Optimization-Based Jailbreak Attacks for Large Language ModelsZhi Xu, Jiaqi Li, Xiaotong Zhang, Hong Yu et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Endless Jailbreaks with Bijection LearningBrian R. Y. Huang, Maximilian Li, Leonard TangICLR 2025
- Stand on The Shoulders of Giants: Building JailExpert from Previous Attack ExperienceXi Wang, Songlei Jian, Shasha Li, Xiaopeng Li et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
