Endless Jailbreaks with Bijection Learning
Brian R. Y. Huang, Maximilian Li, Leonard Tang
Abstract
Despite extensive safety training, LLMs are vulnerable to adversarial inputs. In this work, we introduce a simple but powerful attack paradigm, bijection learning, that yields a practically endless set of jailbreak prompts. We exploit language models' advanced reasoning capabilities to teach them invertible languages (bijections) in context, pass encoded queries to the model to bypass built-in safety mechanisms, and finally decode responses back into English, yielding helpful replies to harmful requests. Our approach proves effective on a wide range of frontier language models and harm categories. Bijection learning is an automated and universal attack that grows stronger with scale: larger models with more advanced reasoning capabilities are more susceptible to bijection learning jailbreaks despite stronger safety mechanisms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b48e8214-ce77-40a8-8dca-e7a2078a6bd6Cited by top-tier papers14
- Best-of-N JailbreakingJohn Hughes, Sara Price, Aengus Lynch, Rylan Schaeffer et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 78 citations
- Strategic Dishonesty Can Undermine AI Safety Evaluations of Frontier LLMsAlexander Panfilov, Evgenii Kortukov, Kristina Nikolic, Matthias Bethge et al.ICLR 2026 · 14 citations
- CoP: Agentic Red-teaming for Large Language Models using Composition of PrinciplesChen Xiong, Pin-Yu Chen, Tsung-Yi HoNeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Bypassing Prompt Guards in Production with Controlled-Release PromptingJaiden Fairoze, Sanjam Garg, Keewoo Lee, Mingyuan WangUSENIX Security 2026 · 8 citations
- Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive AttacksMaksym Andriushchenko, Francesco Croce, Nicolas FlammarionICLR 2025 · 7 citations
Builds on14
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs AutomaticallyAnay Mehrotra, Manolis Zampetakis, Paul Kassianik, Blaine Nelson et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 835 citations
- GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via CipherYouliang Yuan, Wenxiang Jiao, Wenxuan Wang, Jen-tse Huang et al.ICLR 2024 · 441 citations
- Robust Prompt Optimization for Defending Language Models Against Jailbreaking AttacksAndy Zhou, Bo Li, Haohan WangNeurIPS 2024 · 198 citations
- COLD-Attack: Jailbreaking LLMs with Stealthiness and ControllabilityXingang Guo, Fangxu Yu, Huan Zhang, Lianhui Qin et al.ICML 2024 · 173 citations
Related papers
- Large Language Models Are Involuntary Truth-Tellers: Exploiting Fallacy Failure for Jailbreak AttacksYue Zhou, Henry Peng Zou, Barbara Di Eugenio, Yang ZhangEMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- from Benign import Toxic: Jailbreaking the Language Model via Adversarial MetaphorsYu Yan, Sheng Sun, Zenghao Duan, Teli Liu et al.ACL 2025 · 14 citations
- Efficient LLM-Jailbreaking via Multimodal-LLM JailbreakHaoxuan Ji, Zheng Lin, Zhenxing Niu, Xinbo Gao et al.AAAI 2026 · 4 citations
- Harmful Prompt Laundering: Jailbreaking LLMs with Abductive Styles and Symbolic EncodingSeongho Joo, Hyukhun Koh, Kyomin JungEMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Adjacent Words, Divergent Intents: Jailbreaking Large Language Models via Task ConcurrencyYukun Jiang, Mingjie Li, Michael Backes, Yang ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
