SpaCE: The Spatial Confounding Environment
Mauricio Tec, Ana Trisovic, Michelle Audirac, Sophie Woodward, Jie Kate Hu, Naeem Khoshnevis, Francesca Dominici
Abstract
Spatial confounding poses a significant challenge in scientific studies involving spatial data, where unobserved spatial variables can influence both treatment and outcome, possibly leading to spurious associations. To address this problem, we introduce SpaCE: The Spatial Confounding Environment, the first toolkit to provide realistic benchmark datasets and tools for systematically evaluating causal inference methods designed to alleviate spatial confounding. Each dataset includes training data, true counterfactuals, a spatial graph with coordinates, and smoothness and confounding scores characterizing the effect of a missing spatial confounder. It also includes realistic semi-synthetic outcomes and counterfactuals, generated using state-of-the-art machine learning ensembles, following best practices for causal inference benchmarks. The datasets cover real treatment and covariates from diverse domains, including climate, health and social sciences. SpaCE facilitates an automated end-to-end pipeline, simplifying data loading, experimental setup, and evaluating machine learning and causal inference models. The SpaCE project provides several dozens of datasets of diverse sizes and spatial complexity. It is publicly available as a Python package, encouraging community feedback and contributions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d8cef90f-9bd7-4a27-9322-5cdf4e35eca8Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on3
- Learning Counterfactual Representations for Estimating Individual Dose-Response CurvesPatrick Schwab, Lorenz Linhardt, Stefan Bauer, Joachim M. Buhmann et al.AAAI 2020 · 159 citations
- VCNet and Functional Targeted Regularization For Learning Causal Effects of Continuous TreatmentsLizhen Nie, Mao Ye, Qiang Liu, Dan NicolaeICLR 2021 · 81 citations
- How and Why to Use Experimental Data to Evaluate Methods for Observational Causal InferenceAmanda Gentzel, Purva Pruthi, David D. JensenICML 2021 · 22 citations
Related papers
- Discovering Latent Causal Graphs from Spatiotemporal DataKun Wang, Sumanth Varambally, Duncan Watson-Parris, Yian Ma et al.ICML 2025
- Causal Inference using Gaussian Processes with Structured Latent ConfoundersSam Witty, Kenta Takatsu, David D. Jensen, Vikash MansinghkaICML 2020 · 21 citations
- CauSciBench: Can LLMs Automate Causal Inference in Real-World Scientific Research?Sawal Acharya, Terry J Zhang, Andrew Kim, Rahul B Shrestha et al.ICML 2026
- Validating Causal Inference MethodsHarsh Parikh, Carlos Varjao, Louise Xu, Eric Tchetgen TchetgenICML 2022 · 36 citations
- A Data-Centric Decomposition of Estimator Performance in Continuous Treatment Effect EstimationChristopher Bockel-Rickermann, Daan Caljon, Toon Vanderschueren, Tim Verdonck et al.KDD 2026 · 2 citations
