Blameworthiness in Security Games
Pavel Naumov, Jia Tao
2020Year
10Citations
2Top-tier citations
Abstract
Security games are an example of a successful real-world application of game theory. The paper defines blameworthiness of the defender and the attacker in security games using the principle of alternative possibilities and provides a sound and complete logical system for reasoning about blameworthiness in such games. Two of the axioms of this system capture the asymmetry of information in security games.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Ethical Dilemmas in Strategic GamesPavel Naumov, Rui-Jie YewAAAI 2021 · 6 citations
- Higher-Order ResponsibilityJunli Jiang, Pavel NaumovAAAI 2026
Related papers
- Foundations for Cryptographic Reductions in CCSA LogicsDavid Baelde, Adrien Koutsos, Justine SauvageCCS 2024
- Divide and Conquer: A Compositional Approach to Game-Theoretic SecurityIvana Bocevska, Anja Petkovic Komel, Laura Kovács, Sophie Rain et al.OOPSLA 2025
- SoK: Let the Privacy Games Begin! A Unified Treatment of Data Inference Privacy in Machine LearningAhmed Salem, Giovanni Cherubin, David Evans, Boris Köpf et al.S&P 2023
- When Can the Defender Effectively Deceive Attackers in Security Games?Thanh Nguyen, Haifeng XuAAAI 2022 · 4 citations
- Defending against Contagious Attacks on a Network with Resource ReallocationRufan Bai, Haoxing Lin, Xinyu Yang, Xiaowei Wu et al.AAAI 2021 · 4 citations
